Private Investigator and Blackmailer Theory
An unnamed ex-KGB officer who talked to James Rodgers of BBC suspected that Litvinenko "was running short of cash and had no more KGB stories to tell or sell". The source believed that Litvinenko then engaged in a "potentially deadly deal".
According to an interview with Andrei Lugovoi by RIA Novosti, Litvinenko had serious financial problems and badly needed money, as his allowances had been reduced three-fold over the summer
According to Julia Svetlichnaja, a Russian doctoral candidate at the University of Westminster's Center for the Study of Democracy, Litvinenko "was going to blackmail or sell sensitive information about all kinds of powerful people including oligarchs, corrupt officials and sources in the Kremlin". Ms. Svetlichnaya said that Litvinenko "mentioned a figure of £10,000 they would pay each time to stop him broadcasting these FSB documents" and that he "was short of money and was adamant that he could obtain any files he wanted."
According to unnamed British security sources contacted with Richard Beeston, Daniel McGrory and Tony Halpin of The Times, "Litvinenko might have been killed after a deal that went wrong with associates involved in the ruthless world of Russian business". The article's authors said Litvinenko "was envious of the money many of his former colleagues were making" and that his friends said he claimed to be involved in investigations of smuggling rings for nuclear material and prostitutes.
Read more about this topic: Alexander Litvinenko Assassination Theories
Famous quotes containing the words private, investigator and/or theory:
“But the abstract conception
Of private experience at its greatest intensity
Becoming universal, which we call “poetry,”
May be affirmed in verse.”
—T.S. (Thomas Stearns)
““O human creature, ... you are the investigator without knowledge, the magistrate without jurisdiction, and all in all, the fool of the farce.””
—Michel de Montaigne (1533–1592)
“There is in him, hidden deep-down, a great instinctive artist, and hence the makings of an aristocrat. In his muddled way, held back by the manacles of his race and time, and his steps made uncertain by a guiding theory which too often eludes his own comprehension, he yet manages to produce works of unquestionable beauty and authority, and to interpret life in a manner that is poignant and illuminating.”
—H.L. (Henry Lewis)