5-HT3 Antagonist - Comparative Pharmacology of 5-HT3 Antagonists

Comparative Pharmacology of 5-HT3 Antagonists

Despite that the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist share their mechanism of action, they have different chemical structures and exhibit differences in affinity for the receptor, dose response and duration of effect. Also they are metabolized in different ways, that is different components of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system are predominate in the metabolism of the antagonists.

The 5-HT3 receptor antagonist have similar activity. However patients who are resistant to one antagonist might benefit from another, possibly because the drugs are metabolized differently. A correlation exists between the number of active CYP 2D6 alleles and the number of vomiting episodes by patients who receive treatment with cisplatin and ondansetron or tropisetron. Patients with multiple alleles tend to be unresponsive to the antiemetic drug and vice versa.

Comparative pharmacology of 5-HT3 receptor antagonist
Drug Chemical
nature
Receptor antagonists T1/2 (h) Metabolism Dose
Ondansetron Carbazole derivative 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and weak 5-HT4 antagonist 3.9 hours CYP1A1/2, CYP2D6, CYP 3A3/4/5 0.15 mg/kg
Granisetron Indazole 5-HT3 receptor antagonist 9-11.6 hours CYP3A3/4/5 10 µg/kg
Dolasetron Indole 5-HT3 receptor antagonist 7–9 hours CYP 3A3/4/5, CYP2D6 0.6–3 mg/kg
Palonosetron Isoquinoline 5-HT3 receptor antagonist; highest affinity for 5-HT3 receptor in this class 40 hours CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP3A3/4/5 0.25 mg x 1 dose
Ramosetron Benzimidazole derivative 5-HT3 receptor antagonist 5.8 hours 300 µg/kg
Tropisetron Indole 5-HT3 receptor antagonist 5.6 hours CYP 3A3/4/5, CYP2D6 200 µg/kg

Read more about this topic:  5-HT3 Antagonist

Famous quotes containing the words comparative and/or antagonists:

    The hill farmer ... always seems to make out somehow with his corn patch, his few vegetables, his rifle, and fishing rod. This self-contained economy creates in the hillman a comparative disinterest in the world’s affairs, along with a disdain of lowland ways. “I don’t go to question the good Lord in his wisdom,” runs the phrasing attributed to a typical mountaineer, “but I jest cain’t see why He put valleys in between the hills.”
    —Administration in the State of Arka, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)

    There is a persuasion in the soul of man that he is here for cause, that he was put down in this place by the Creator to do the work for which he inspires him, that thus he is an overmatch for all antagonists that could combine against him.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)