38th Infantry Division (United States) - Current Structure

Current Structure

38th Infantry Division exercises Training and Readiness Oversight of the following elements, they cannot be considered organic:

  • Division Special Troops Battalion
  • 37th (Infantry) Brigade Combat Team (OH NG)
    • Special Troops Battalion
    • 1st Squadron, 126th Cavalry Regiment (MI NG)
    • 1st Battalion, 125th Infantry Regiment (MI NG)
    • 1st Battalion, 148th Infantry Regiment
    • 1st Battalion, 134th Field Artillery Regiment
    • 237th Brigade Support Battalion
  • 76th (Infantry) Brigade Combat Team (IN NG)
    • Special Troops Battalion
    • 1st Squadron, 238th Cavalry Regiment (RSTA)
    • 1st Battalion, 152nd Infantry Regiment
    • 1st Battalion, 293rd Infantry Regiment
    • 1st Battalion, 163rd Field Artillery Regiment
    • 113th Brigade Support Battalion
  • 278th (Heavy) Brigade Combat Team (TN NG)
    • Special Troops Battalion
    • 1st Squadron, 278th Cavalry Regiment (RSTA)
    • 3rd Battalion, 109th Armor Regiment
    • 4th Battalion, 117th Infantry Regiment
    • 3rd Battalion, 115th Field Artillery Regiment
    • 473rd Brigade Support Battalion
  • Combat Aviation Brigade, 38th Infantry Division (IN NG)
    • Headquarters and Headquarters Company
    • 1st Battalion (Attack), 130th Aviation Regiment (North Carolina National Guard)
    • 1st Battalion (Assault), 137th Aviation Regiment (Ohio and Indiana National Guard)
    • 2nd Battalion (General Support), 238th Aviation Regiment (Indiana/Delaware/Ohio National Guard)
    • 2nd Battalion (Security & Support), 151st Aviation Regiment (South Carolina/Virginia/Florida/North Carolina/Georgia/Alabama National Guard)
    • 638th Support Battalion (Aviation) (Indiana/Ohio/North Carolina/Indiana/Massachusetts National Guard)

Read more about this topic:  38th Infantry Division (United States)

Famous quotes containing the words current and/or structure:

    I have come to believe ... that the stage may do more than teach, that much of our current moral instruction will not endure the test of being cast into a lifelike mold, and when presented in dramatic form will reveal itself as platitudinous and effete. That which may have sounded like righteous teaching when it was remote and wordy will be challenged afresh when it is obliged to simulate life itself.
    Jane Addams (1860–1935)

    One theme links together these new proposals for family policy—the idea that the family is exceedingly durable. Changes in structure and function and individual roles are not to be confused with the collapse of the family. Families remain more important in the lives of children than other institutions. Family ties are stronger and more vital than many of us imagine in the perennial atmosphere of crisis surrounding the subject.
    Joseph Featherstone (20th century)