Pre-World War I Organization
German divisions underwent various organizational changes after the Franco-Prussian War. The division was subordinated to the newly-created XVIII Army Corps in 1899 and in the same year the division's 25th Field Artillery Brigade was created. The organization of the 25th Division in 1914, shortly before the outbreak of World War I, was as follows:
- 49. Infanterie-Brigade (1. Großherzoglich Hessische)
- Leibgarde-Infanterie-Regiment (1. Großherzoglich Hessisches) Nr. 115
- Infanterie-Regiment Kaiser Wilhelm (2. Großherzoglich Hessisches) Nr. 116
- Infanterie-Regiment (5. Großherzoglich Hessisches) Nr. 168
- 50. Infanterie-Brigade (2. Großherzoglich Hessische)
- Infanterie-Leibregiment Großherzogin (3. Großherzoglich Hessisches) Nr. 117
- Infanterie-Regiment Prinz Carl (4. Großherzoglich Hessisches) Nr. 118
- 25. Kavallerie-Brigade (Großherzoglich Hessische)
- Garde-Dragoner-Regiment (1. Großherzoglich Hessisches) Nr. 23
- Leib-Dragoner-Regiment (2. Großherzoglich Hessisches) Nr. 24
- 25. Feldartillerie-Brigade (Großherzoglich Hessische)
- Großherzogliches Artilleriekorps, 1. Großherzoglich Hessisches Feldartillerie-Regiment Nr. 25
- 2. Großherzoglich Hessisches Feldartillerie-Regiment Nr. 61
- Großherzoglich Hessische Train-Abteilung Nr. 18
- Großherzoglich Hessische Garde-Unteroffizier Kompanie
Read more about this topic: 25th Division (German Empire)
Famous quotes containing the words war and/or organization:
“... it is a commonplace that men like war. For peace, in our society, with the feeling we have then that it is feeble-minded to strive except for ones own private profit, is a lonely thing and a hazardous business. Over and over men have proved that they prefer the hazards of war with all its suffering. It has its compensations.”
—Ruth Benedict (18871948)
“The organization controlling the material equipment of our everyday life is such that what in itself would enable us to construct it richly plunges us instead into a poverty of abundance, making alienation all the more intolerable as each convenience promises liberation and turns out to be only one more burden. We are condemned to slavery to the means of liberation.”
—Raoul Vaneigem (b. 1934)