2009 Thai Premier League - Results

Results

Last updated October 18, 2009

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1. Thai Port 0-1 1-0 1-0 1-2 2-1 0-0 1-0 1-0 1-1 0-1 0-1 0-0 3-0 1-0 2-1
2. PEA 2-2 4-1 2-2 2-2 4-1 0-2 1-2 1-2 3-2 2-0 0-0 2-0 0-2 2-2 0-1
3. Pattaya Utd 1-1 2-0 2-1 0-0 1-0 0-1 1-1 2-2 1-0 0-0 4-0 2-0 1-1 0-0 1-1
4. Chula Utd 0-2 3-1 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-2 1-3 1-2 1-1 0-0 1-0 0-0 1-2
5. Chonburi 2-1 3-0 2-0 2-2 2-1 2-1 2-5 1-3 3-0 1-0 2-2 5-1 3-2 2-0 1-0
6. Rajnavy Rayong 1-2 1-1 3-2 1-1 0-1 0-3 1-2 0-1 1-1 0-0 0-3 0-1 1-0 2-0 2-1
7. TOT 1-2 1-1 3-1 3-0 0-0 2-1 0-0 2-1 2-1 1-4 1-1 1-1 1-0 0-1 1-2
8. Muang Thong Utd 3-0 1-0 1-0 2-1 1-1 2-1 3-0 1-0 3-1 2-0 0-0 2-2 0-0 3-1 2-1
9. Bangkok Glass 1-1 3-1 2-1 4-2 1-0 1-0 1-1 1-0 1-0 3-3 2-0 2-1 1-0 2-1 0-0
10. Nakhon Pathom 2-0 1-1 3-1 2-2 1-2 2-1 3-1 1-1 2-5 1-0 1-2 1-3 1-3 0-1 0-1
11. BEC Tero Sasana 3-1 0-1 3-1 5-0 1-2 2-1 4-0 1-4 1-1 3-0 3-0 0-0 3-2 2-0 2-3
12. TTM Samut Sakhon 2-1 1-0 0-0 1-1 2-1 1-1 1-1 0-2 2-1 4-0 1-2 2-2 0-0 0-1 0-0
13. Bangkok Utd 2-2 0-2 0-0 0-1 1-1 0-1 1-1 1-2 1-1 0-0 1-1 2-1 1-0 0-1 1-2
14. Sriracha 0-3 2-0 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-1 1-1 0-1 2-0 2-0 4-2 1-0 0-0 1-2 2-2
15. Samut Songkhram 0-0 0-1 1-0 3-0 0-1 0-3 0-1 0-1 1-1 1-1 1-2 1-0 1-1 2-0 0-2
16. Osotsapa 2-1 2-2 1-0 1-1 1-2 0-1 0-0 1-0 2-0 3-1 0-3 1-1 0-1 1-3 2-1

Read more about this topic:  2009 Thai Premier League

Famous quotes containing the word results:

    There is not a single rule, however plausible, and however firmly grounded in epistemology, that is not violated at some time or other. It becomes evident that such violations are not accidental events, they are not results of insufficient knowledge or of inattention which might have been avoided. On the contrary, we see that they are necessary for progress.
    Paul Feyerabend (1924–1994)

    How can you tell if you discipline effectively? Ask yourself if your disciplinary methods generally produce lasting results in a manner you find acceptable. Whether your philosophy is democratic or autocratic, whatever techniques you use—reasoning, a “star” chart, time-outs, or spanking—if it doesn’t work, it’s not effective.
    Stanley Turecki (20th century)

    Social improvement is attained more readily by a concern with the quality of results than with the purity of motives.
    Eric Hoffer (1902–1983)