2009 Rally Norway - Results

Results

Pos. Driver Co-driver Car Time Difference Points
WRC
1. Sébastien Loeb Daniel Elena Citroën C4 WRC 3:28:15.9 10
2. Mikko Hirvonen Jarmo Lehtinen Ford Focus RS WRC 08 3:28:25.7 +9.8 8
3. Jari-Matti Latvala Miikka Anttila Ford Focus RS WRC 08 3:29:37.7 +1:21.8 6
4. Henning Solberg Cato Menkerud Ford Focus RS WRC 08 3:31:49.4 +3:33.5 5
5. Dani Sordo Marc Marti Citroën C4 WRC 3:32:07.9 +3:52.0 4
6. Petter Solberg Phil Mills Citroën Xsara WRC 3:34:41.3 +6:25.4 3
7. Matthew Wilson Scott Martin Ford Focus RS WRC 08 3:34:51.5 +6:35.6 2
8. Urmo Aava Kuldar Sikk Ford Focus RS WRC 08 3:35:05.0 +6:49.1 1
PWRC
1. (13.) Patrik Sandell Emil Axelsson Škoda Fabia Super 2000 3:49:43.6 10
2. (14.) Eyvind Brynildsen Denis Giraudet Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX 3:50:27.7 +44.1 8
3. (16.) Martin Prokop Jan Tománek Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX 3:52:40.3 +2:56.7 6
4. (17.) Armindo Araujo Miguel Ramalho Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX 3:53:40.6 +3:57.0 5
5. (18.) Andis Neiksans Peteris Dzirkals Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX 4:00:23.5 +10:39.9 4
6. (20.) Jaromir Tarabus Daniel Trunkat Fiat Abarth Grande Punto S2000 4:02:33.1 +12:49.5 3
7. (26.) Patrik Flodin Göran Bergsten Subaru Impreza WRX STI 4:10:01.1 +20:17.5 2
8. (30.) Frederic Sauvan Thibault Gorczyca Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX 4:24:48.0 +35:04.4 1

Read more about this topic:  2009 Rally Norway

Famous quotes containing the word results:

    The peace conference must not adjourn without the establishment of some ordered system of international government, backed by power enough to give authority to its decrees. ... Unless a league something like this results at our peace conference, we shall merely drop back into armed hostility and international anarchy. The war will have been fought in vain ...
    Virginia Crocheron Gildersleeve (1877–1965)

    Being a parent is unlike any previous job—the results of any one action are not clearly visible for a long time, if at all.
    —Anonymous Mother. As quoted in Between Generations by Ellen Galinsky, ch. 2 (1981)

    Pain itself can be pleasurable accidentally in so far as it is accompanied by wonder, as in stage-plays; or in so far as it recalls a beloved object to one’s memory, and makes one feel one’s love for the thing, whose absence gives us pain. Consequently, since love is pleasant, both pain and whatever else results from love, in so far as they remind us of our love, are pleasant.
    Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225–1274)