2005 Reasons of The Supreme Court of Canada - Reasons

Reasons

Delivered the Court's reason Joined the Court's reason Filed a concurrence Joined a concurrence
Filed a dissent Joined a dissent Filed a concurrence/dissent Joined a concurrence/dissent
Did not participate in the judgment Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering
  • Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's reason are per coram.
  • Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices occasionally join multiple reasons in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.
  • Multiple unnumbered reasons are jointly written or delivered.
  • Decisions that are given orally from the bench are denoted by a "V".
Case name Argued Decided
V








V
Case name Argued Decided










V




Case name Argued Decided




1
1
1
2
V
Case name Argued Decided
V
Case name Argued Decided
V
Case name Argued Decided
2
1
1
1
Case name Argued Decided
V
V
V
Case name Argued Decided
V

Read more about this topic:  2005 Reasons Of The Supreme Court Of Canada

Famous quotes containing the word reasons:

    Could truth perhaps be a woman who has reasons for not permitting her reasons to be seen? Could her name perhaps be—to speak Greek—Baubo?... Oh, those Greeks! They understood how to live: to do that it is necessary to stop bravely at the surface, the fold, the skin, to adore the appearance, to believe in forms, in tones, in words, in the whole Olympus of appearance! Those Greeks were superficial—out of profundity!
    Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900)

    Scepticism is an ability, or mental attitude, which opposes appearances to judgments in any way whatsoever, with the result that, owing to the equipollence of the objects and reasons thus opposed we are brought firstly to a state of mental suspense and next to a state of “unperturbedness” or quietude.
    Sextus Empiricus (2nd or 3rd cen., A.d.)

    Most personal correspondence of today consists of letters the first half of which are given over to an indexed statement of why the writer hasn’t written before, followed by one paragraph of small talk, with the remainder devoted to reasons why it is imperative that the letter be brought to a close.
    Robert Benchley (1889–1945)