1981 World Ice Hockey Championships - World Championship Group C (China PR)

World Championship Group C (China PR)

Played in Beijing March 6–15.

Team Games Won Drawn Lost Points difference Points
17 Austria 7 7 0 0 43 - 05 14
18 China 7 6 0 1 46 - 14 12
19 Hungary 7 4 1 2 38 - 22 9
20 Denmark 7 3 1 3 36 - 27 7
21 France 7 3 0 4 48 - 36 6
22 Bulgaria 7 3 0 4 22 - 32 6
23 North Korea 7 1 0 6 18 - 66 2
24 Great Britain 7 0 0 7 11 - 60 0

Both Austria and China were promoted to Group B.

06 March Austria 10-0
North Korea

06 March Hungary 8-0
Great Britain

06 March France 7-0
Bulgaria

06 March China 5-1
Denmark

07 March Great Britain 2-11
France

07 March China 6-2
Bulgaria

07 March North Korea 5-9
Denmark

07 March Austria 7-0
Hungary

09 March Hungary 10-3
North Korea

09 March Denmark 4-6
Bulgaria

09 March France 1-7
Austria

09 March China 12-2
Great Britain

10 March Hungary 11-6
France

10 March North Korea 2-9
Bulgaria

10 March Great Britain 2-13
Denmark

10 March China 0-3
Austria

12 March Bulgaria 4-2
Great Britain

12 March France 17-1
North Korea

12 March Austria 4-2
Denmark

12 March China 3-1
Hungary

13 March China 10-3
France

13 March Great Britain 1-5
North Korea

13 March Hungary 2-2
Denmark

13 March Austria 5-0
Bulgaria

15 March Austria 7-2
Great Britain

15 March Bulgaria 1-6
Hungary

15 March France 3-5
Denmark

15 March China 10-2
North Korea

Read more about this topic:  1981 World Ice Hockey Championships

Famous quotes containing the words world and/or group:

    Books, gentlemen, are a species of men, and introduced to them you circulate in the “very best society” that this world can furnish, without the intolerable infliction of “dressing” to go into it. In your shabbiest coat and cosiest slippers you may socially chat even with the fastidious Earl of Chesterfield, and lounging under a tree enjoy the divinest intimacy with my late lord of Verulam.
    Herman Melville (1819–1891)

    Unless a group of workers know their work is under surveillance, that they are being rated as fairly as human beings, with the fallibility that goes with human judgment, can rate them, and that at least an attempt is made to measure their worth to an organization in relative terms, they are likely to sink back on length of service as the sole reason for retention and promotion.
    Mary Barnett Gilson (1877–?)