Conservation Status
This species is listed as Data Deficient (DD) on the IUCN Red List of threatened species (v2.3, 1994). This means that there is inadequate information to make a direct, or indirect, assessment of the risk of extinction based on its distribution and/or population status. This species may be well studied, and its biology well known, but appropriate data on abundance and/or distribution is lacking. Therefore, this not a category of threat or Lower Risk, but an indication that more information is required, as well as an acknowledgement of the possibility that future research will show that threatened classification is appropriate. It is important to make positive use of whatever data are available. In many cases, great care should be exercised in choosing between DD and threatened status. If the range of the species is suspected to be relatively circumscribed, or if a considerable period of time has elapsed since the last record of the species, then threatened status may well be justified. Year assessed: 1996.
Read more about this topic: Xenocalamus Transvaalensis
Famous quotes containing the words conservation and/or status:
“The putting into force of laws which shall secure the conservation of our resources, as far as they may be within the jurisdiction of the Federal Government, including the more important work of saving and restoring our forests and the great improvement of waterways, are all proper government functions which must involve large expenditure if properly performed.”
—William Howard Taft (1857–1930)
“Recent studies that have investigated maternal satisfaction have found this to be a better prediction of mother-child interaction than work status alone. More important for the overall quality of interaction with their children than simply whether the mother works or not, these studies suggest, is how satisfied the mother is with her role as worker or homemaker. Satisfied women are consistently more warm, involved, playful, stimulating and effective with their children than unsatisfied women.”
—Alison Clarke-Stewart (20th century)