Political Position
The WPK is generally seen as similar to Communist Parties in the industrialized world which occupy a far-left position on the political spectrum. According to conventional wisdom in the West, it is the most hardline and unreformed of the five current ruling Communist/Workers’ parties, and the closest thing to an old-style Stalinist party.
The WPK maintains a leftist image. It sends a delegation to the International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties where the WPK receives minor support: Its 2011 resolution “Let us jointly commemorate the Birth Centenary of the Great Leader comrade President Kim Il Sung as a Grand Political Festival of the World’s Humankind” was signed by 30 of the 79 attending parties.
However, professor B. R. Myers argues that there is a stark difference between DPRK’s and WPK’s propaganda to the international audience and domestic propaganda. After analyzing the domestic propaganda, he concluded that the WPK is not a far-left or Communist party, but rather a far-right party. Myers holds that the party has a platform of “race-based, paranoid nationalism that has nothing to do with Marxism-Leninism,” making it more comparable to 1930’s Japan than other Eastern-Bloc communist parties. After the release of Myers’ 2009 book The Cleanest Race, his views gained acceptance. Russian historian Andrei Lankov favorably reviewed it as taking a “fresh approach” on North Korea. Christopher Hitchens called the book and the analysis “electrifying” and “finely argued and brilliantly written”.
Read more about this topic: Workers' Party Of Korea
Famous quotes containing the words political and/or position:
“How does it become a man to behave toward this American government to-day? I answer, that he cannot without disgrace be associated with it. I cannot for an instant recognize that political organization as my government which is the slaves government also.”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)
“The essence of spirit, he thought to himself, was to choose the thing which did not better ones position but made it more perilous. That was why the world he knew was poor, for it insisted morality and caution were identical.”
—Norman Mailer (b. 1923)