Without loss of generality (abbreviated to WLOG; less commonly stated as without any loss of generality or with no loss of generality) is a frequently used expression in mathematics. The term is used before an assumption in a proof which narrows the premise to some special case; it is implied that the proof for that case can be easily applied to all others, or that all other cases are equivalent. Thus, given a proof of the conclusion in the special case, it is trivial to adapt it to prove the conclusion in all other cases.
This often requires the presence of symmetry. For example, in proving (i.e., that some property holds for any two real numbers and ), if we wish to assume "without loss of generality" that, then it is required that be symmetrical in and, namely that is equivalent to . There is then no loss of generality in assuming, since a proof for that case can trivially be adapted for the other case by interchanging and (leading to the conclusion, which is known to be equivalent to, the desired conclusion.)
Read more about Without Loss Of Generality: Example
Famous quotes containing the words loss and/or generality:
“Quarrel not at all. No man resolved to make the most of himself, can spare time for personal contention. Still less can he afford to take all the consequences, including the vitiating of his temper, and the loss of self-control. Yield larger things to which you can show no more than equal right; and yield lesser ones, though clearly your own. Better give your path to a dog, than be bitten by him in contesting for the right. Even killing the dog would not cure the bite.”
—Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)
“The generality of virtuous women are like hidden treasures—they are safe only because nobody has sought after them.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)