Wiki Project Sheffield - Article Assessments

Article Assessments

Sheffield articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 1 1 2
GA 1 3 3 7
B 1 9 24 8 2 44
C 4 5 59 58 126
Start 4 29 149 241 13 436
Stub 7 31 186 4 228
List 2 5 5 12
Book 1 1
Category 7 7
Disambig 1 2 3
Template 1 9 3 3 16
NA 1 1
Assessed 11 53 281 508 11 19 883
Unassessed 2 25 27
Total 11 53 281 510 11 44 910
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 70034197000000000004,197 Ω = 4.98
Main page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Sheffield/Assessment

The article ratings are used within the project itself to aid in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Sheffield}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Sheffield articles by quality and Category:Sheffield articles by priority, which are themselves sub-categories of the master category for administration categories: Category:WikiProject Sheffield.

Discusions of the ratings in general is on the Assessments talk page, specific articles assessmet ratings can be discused on the articles own talk page or raised on the Project talk page.

As of 2 October 2008, we have assessed 95% of all articles with a project banner.


Read more about this topic:  Wiki Project Sheffield

Famous quotes containing the word article:

    I review novels to make money, because it is easier for a sluggard to write an article a fortnight than a book a year, because the writer is soothed by the opiate of action, the crank by posing as a good journalist, and having an airhole. I dislike it. I do it and I am always resolving to give it up.
    Cyril Connolly (1903–1974)