See Also
- More from Holt
- Jones v Hart 2 Salk 441
- Middleton v Fowler 1 Salk 282
- Hern v Nichols 1 Salk 289
- On liability for strangers and acts of God emanating from land
- Sedleigh Denfield v O’Callaghan AC 880
- Goldman v Hargrave 1 AC 645
- Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd 1 AC 241
- Leakey v National Trust QB 485
- On vicarious liability
- Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd 1 AC 215
- Hall (Inspector of Taxes) v Lorimer 1 All ER 250, freelance vision mixer not an employee for tax purposes, ‘never been better put than by Cooke J’ in Market Investigations Ltd v Minister of Social Security 2 QB 173
- Lee Ting Sang v Chung Chi-Keung 2 AC 374, 384, had own tools, paid by piece and did not price the job. ‘The applicant ran no risk whatever save that of being unable to find employment which is, of course, a risk faced by casual employees who move from one job to another…’
- Articles
- O Kahn-Freund, ‘Servants and Independent-Contractors’ (1951) 14 Modern Law Review 504, control test unrealistic today
- JW Neyers, ‘A Theory of Vicarious Liability’ (2005) 43 Alberta Law Review 287
Read more about this topic: Turberville V Stampe
Famous quotes containing the word see:
“Then turning to the disciples, Jesus said to them privately, Blessed are the eyes that see what you see! For I tell you that many prophets and kings desired to see what you see, but did not see it, and to hear what you hear, but did not hear it.”
—Bible: New Testament, Luke 10:23,24.