Survey To Identify Massacre Victims
This project was a survey of the number of civilian victims of the mass killings the took place during the Korean War and was carried out in collaboration with outside research teams. In 2007, the Seokdang Research Institute at Dong-a University carried out a survey of civilian victims in the cities of Gimhae and Gongju as well as rural areas in Jeolla, Chuncheong, Gyeongsang, and Gyeonggi provinces. The selected regions were chosen after estimating the scale and the representative-ness of each mass killing. In particular, Ganghwa County, near Incheon, was included because it was on the military borderline between the two conflicting powers at the time, and Gimhae was significant because a large number of mass killings against civilians occurred there even though the region was never taken by the North.
In 2007, the above-mentioned investigative process was conducted on a total of 3,820 individuals including bereaved family members and witnesses. As a result, some 8,600 victims were uncovered.
Categorized by region, there were found
- 356 victims in Ganghwa County,
- 385 victims in Cheongwon County,
- 65 victims in Gongju,
- 373 victims in Yeocheon County,
- 517 victims in Cheongdo County,
- 283 victims in Gimhae,
- 1,880 victims in Gochang County,
- 2,818 victims in Youngam County, and
- 1,318 victims in Gurye County.
Divided by the type of victim, there were found
- 1,457 leftist guerillas killed by the army or police forces of South Korea,
- 1,348 Bodo League members,
- 1,318 local leftist victims,
- 1,092 victims from the Yeosun Incident,
- 892 victims accused of being collaborators of North Korea, etc.
Read more about this topic: Truth And Reconciliation Commission (South Korea)
Famous quotes containing the words survey, identify, massacre and/or victims:
“By contrast with history, evolution is an unconscious process. Another, and perhaps a better way of putting it would be to say that evolution is a natural process, history a human one.... Insofar as we treat man as a part of nature—for instance in a biological survey of evolution—we are precisely not treating him as a historical being. As a historically developing being, he is set over against nature, both as a knower and as a doer.”
—Owen Barfield (b. 1898)
“The difference between style and taste is never easy to define, but style tends to be centered on the social, and taste upon the individual. Style then works along axes of similarity to identify group membership, to relate to the social order; taste works within style to differentiate and construct the individual. Style speaks about social factors such as class, age, and other more flexible, less definable social formations; taste talks of the individual inflection of the social.”
—John Fiske (b. 1939)
“It is hard, I submit, to loathe bloodshed, including war, more than I do, but it is still harder to exceed my loathing of the very nature of totalitarian states in which massacre is only an administrative detail.”
—Vladimir Nabokov (1899–1977)
“He was warned. And now he’s paid. Let him be buried with the other victims of human greed and folly.”
—Cyril Hume, and Fred McLeod Wilcox. Dr. Morbius (Walter Pidgeon)