Transformation Efficiency - Measure of Transformation Efficiency

Measure of Transformation Efficiency

Transformation effiency should be determined under conditions of cell excess. The standard plasmids used for determination of transformation efficiency in Escherichia coli are pBR322 or the smaller pUC series of vectors, different vectors however may be used to determine their transformation efficiency. The number of viable cells in a transformation reaction may range from 2x108 to 1011; most common methods of E. coli preparation yield around 1010 viable cells per reaction. 10-100 pg of DNA may be used for transformation, more DNA may be necessary for low-efficiency transformation. After transformation, plate separately 1% and 10% of the cells (dilute cells in media as necessary for ease of plating), but further dilution may be used for high efficiency transformation.

Transformation efficiency is measured in transformants or colony forming unit (cfu) per μg DNA used. A transformation efficiency of 1x108 cfu/μg for a small plasmid like pUC19 is roughly equivalent to 1 in 2000 molecules of the plasmid used being transformed. In E. coli, the theoretical limit of transformation efficiency for most commonly used plasmids would be over 1x1011 cfu/μg. In practice the best achievable result may be around 2-4x1010 cfu/μg for a small plasmid like pUC19, and considerably lower for large plasmids.

Read more about this topic:  Transformation Efficiency

Famous quotes containing the words measure of, measure and/or efficiency:

    One might imagine that a movement which is so preoccupied with the fulfillment of human potential would have a measure of respect for those who nourish its source. But politics make strange bedfellows, and liberated women have elected to become part of a long tradition of hostility to mothers.
    Elaine Heffner (20th century)

    What will our children remember of us, ten, fifteen years from now? The mobile we bought or didn’t buy? Or the tone in our voices, the look in our eyes, the enthusiasm for life—and for them—that we felt? They, and we, will remember the spirit of things, not the letter. Those memories will go so deep that no one could measure it, capture it, bronze it, or put it in a scrapbook.
    Sonia Taitz (20th century)

    “Never hug and kiss your children! Mother love may make your children’s infancy unhappy and prevent them from pursuing a career or getting married!” That’s total hogwash, of course. But it shows on extreme example of what state-of-the-art “scientific” parenting was supposed to be in early twentieth-century America. After all, that was the heyday of efficiency experts, time-and-motion studies, and the like.
    Lawrence Kutner (20th century)