Transcendental Argument For The Existence of God - The Argument

The Argument

The TAG is a transcendental argument that attempts to prove that God is the precondition of all human knowledge and experience, by demonstrating the impossibility of the contrary; in other words, that logic, reason, or morality cannot exist without God. The argument proceeds as follows:

  1. If there is no god (most often the entity God, defined as the god of the Christian bible), knowledge is not possible.
  2. Knowledge is possible (or some other statement pertaining to logic or morality).
  3. Therefore a god exists.

Cornelius Van Til likewise wrote:

We must point out that reasoning itself leads to self-contradiction, not only from a theistic point of view, but from a non-theistic point of view as well... It is this that we ought to mean when we say that we reason from the impossibility of the contrary. The contrary is impossible only if it is self-contradictory when operating on the basis of its own assumptions. —(A Survey of Christian Epistemology, p. 204).

Therefore, the TAG differs from Thomistic and Evidentialist arguments, which posit the probable existence of God in order to avoid an infinite regress of causes or motions, to explain life on Earth, and so on. The TAG posits the necessary existence of a particular conception of God in order for human knowledge and experience to be possible at all. The TAG argues that, because the triune God of the Bible, being completely logical, uniform, and good, exhibits a character in the created order and the creatures themselves (especially in humans), human knowledge and experience are possible. This reasoning implies that all other alternatives such as Buddhism and Islam, when followed to their logical conclusions, descend into absurdity, arbitrariness or inconsistency.

Read more about this topic:  Transcendental Argument For The Existence Of God

Other articles related to "argument, arguments, the argument":

Default Arguments
... In computer programming, a default argument is an argument to a function that a programmer is not required to specify ... In most programming languages, functions may take one or more arguments ... Usually, each argument must be specified in full (this is the case in the C programming language) ...
Argument From Reason - The Argument
... Lewis originally posited the argument as follows One absolutely central inconsistency ruins ... Lewis, Is Theology Poetry The argument against materialism holds For an assertion to be capable of truth or falsehood it must come from a rational source (see explanation below) ... The argument for the existence of God holds (5) A being requires a rational process to assess the truth or falsehood of a claim (hereinafter, to be convinced by argument) ...
Argument - Fallacies and Nonarguments
... A fallacy is an invalid argument that appears valid, or a valid argument with disguised assumptions ... so, because and hence typically separate the premises from the conclusion of an argument, but this is not necessarily so ... is a man, all men are mortal therefore Socrates is mortal is clearly an argument (a valid one at that), because it is clear it is asserted that Socrates is mortal follows from the preceding statements ...
Experience Machine - The Thought Experiment - The Argument
... The argument is along these lines P1 If experiencing as much pleasure as we can is all that matters to us, then if we will experience more pleasure by doing x than ...
Retro-bolting - Argument - Against
... Climbing is an adventure sport that is inherently risky ... A climber should understand and accept this risk ...

Famous quotes containing the word argument:

    The wonder of light is your familiar tale,
    Pert wench, down to the nineteenth century:
    Mr. Rimbaud the Frenchman’s apostasy
    Asserts the argument that you are stale,
    Flat and unprofitable, importunate but pale,
    Lithe Corpse!
    Allen Tate (1899–1979)

    Our argument ... will result, not upon logic by itself—though without logic we should never have got to this point—but upon the fortunate contingent fact that people who would take this logically possible view, after they had really imagined themselves in the other man’s position, are extremely rare.
    Richard M. Hare (b. 1919)