Tom Foley - Electoral History

Electoral History

Here is a chart of the vote in his elections. There are subtotals for the city of Spokane, rural Spokane County, and a Spokane total, as this is the main part of the 5th Congressional District.

Year Candidate Party Spokane Outside County District
1964 Tom Foley* D 41,377 17,587 58,964 84,830
Walt Horan (Inc) R 32,262 16,757 49,019 73,884
1966 Tom Foley* D 35,533 15,334 50,867 74,571
Dorothy Powers R 25,357 13,232 38,589 57,310
1968 Tom Foley* D 41,203 19,227 60,430 88,446
Richard Bond R 29,659 16,988 46,647 67,304
1970 Tom Foley* D 40,791 20,532 61,323 88,189
George Gamble R 19,926 11,928 31,854 43,376
1972 Tom Foley* D 58,282 35,060 93,342 150,580
Clarice Privette R 12,468 8,637 21,105 34,742
1974 Tom Foley* D 30,717 18,726 49,443 87,959
Gary Gage R 16,925 12,020 28,945 48,739
1976 Tom Foley* D 41,720 27,905 69,625 120,415
Duane Alton R 30,318 25,519 55,837 84,262
Bear Sandahl L 834 407 1,241 1,959
Ira Liebowitz USL 403 181 584 935
1978 Tom Foley* D 28,346 18,858 47,204 77,201
Duane Alton R 20,923 18,942 39,865 68,761
Mel Tonasket I 5,574 4,580 10,154 14,887
1980 Tom Foley* D 41,256 31,604 72,860 120,530
John Sonneland R 32,857 33,662 66,519 111,705
1982 Tom Foley* D 39,810 32,362 72,172 109,549
John Sonneland R 18,482 20,420 38,902 60,816
1984 Tom Foley* D 56,820 49,360 106,180 154,988
John Sonneland R 20,517 23,729 44,246 67,438
1986 Tom Foley* D 43,011 37,939 80,950 121,732
Floyd Wakefield R 12,510 14,281 26,791 41,179
1988 Tom Foley* D 56,249 53,791 110,040 160,654
Marlyn Derby R 14,438 17,772 32,210 49,657
1990 Tom Foley* D 38,553 37,121 75,674 110,234
Marlyn Derby R 15,082 18,363 33,445 49,965
1992 Tom Foley* D 49,675 45,919 95,594 135,965
John Sonneland R 32,508 40,108 72,616 110,443
1994 Tom Foley D 39,331 35,323 74,654 106,074
George Nethercutt* R 30,265 41,065 71,330 110,057

Read more about this topic:  Tom Foley

Famous quotes containing the words electoral and/or history:

    “Power is action; the electoral principle is discussion. No political action is possible when discussion is permanently established.”
    —Honoré De Balzac (1799–1850)

    “In nature, all is useful, all is beautiful. It is therefore beautiful, because it is alive, moving, reproductive; it is therefore useful, because it is symmetrical and fair. Beauty will not come at the call of a legislature, nor will it repeat in England or America its history in Greece. It will come, as always, unannounced, and spring up between the feet of brave and earnest men.”
    —Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)