Theories of Humor

Theories Of Humor

There are many theories of humour which attempt to explain what humour is, what social functions it serves, and what would be considered humorous. It would be very difficult to explain humour to a hypothetical person who did not have a sense of humour already. In fact, to such a person humour would appear to be quite strange if not outright irrational behavior. Among the prevailing types of theories that attempt to account for the existence of humour there are: psychological theories, the vast majority of which consider humour to be very healthy behavior; there are spiritual theories which may, for instance consider humour to be a "gift from God;" there are also theories that consider humour to be an unexplainable mystery, very much like a mystical experience. Although various classical theories of humour and laughter may be found, in contemporary academic literature, three theories of humour appear repeatedly: relief theory, superiority theory, and incongruity theory. Among current humour researchers, there is no consensus about which of these three theories of humour is most viable. Proponents of each one originally claimed their theory to be capable of explaining all cases of humour, however, they now acknowledge that although each theory generally covers its own area of focus, many instances of humour can be explained by more than one theory. Incongruity and superiority theories, for instance, seem to describe complementary mechanisms which together create humour.

Read more about Theories Of Humor:  Relief Theory, Superiority Theory, Incongruity Theory, General Theory of Verbal Humor, Computational-Neural Theory of Humor, Ontic-Epistemic Theory of Humor, Sexual Selection, Detection of Mistaken Reasoning, Misattribution Theory, Benign Violation Theory, Humor As Defense Mechanism, Sense of Humor, Sense of Seriousness, Metaphor and Metonymy, See Also

Famous quotes containing the words theories and/or humor:

    The two most far-reaching critical theories at the beginning of the latest phase of industrial society were those of Marx and Freud. Marx showed the moving powers and the conflicts in the social-historical process. Freud aimed at the critical uncovering of the inner conflicts. Both worked for the liberation of man, even though Marx’s concept was more comprehensive and less time-bound than Freud’s.
    Erich Fromm (1900–1980)

    Affection, indulgence, and humor alike are powerless against the instinct of children to rebel. It is essential to their minds and their wills as exercise is to their bodies. If they have no reasons, they will invent them, like nations bound on war. It is hard to imagine families limp enough always to be at peace. Wherever there is character there will be conflict. The best that children and parents can hope for is that the wounds of their conflict may not be too deep or too lasting.
    —New York State Division of Youth Newsletter (20th century)