Theatre in The Round - The Politics of The Round

The Politics of The Round

The politics of theater-in-the-round were explored most deliberately by RG Gregory. In his view the lit space of Proscenium Arch is analogous to the seat of power; the audience adopts the role of passive receivers. In traditional theater design, maximum care is taken with sight lines in order to ensure that the actor can engage every member of the audience at the same time.

However, once removed from the picture frame of the arch, the actors are compelled to turn their back on some members of the audience and so necessarily lose exclusive command of the acting space. All members of the audience can see the actor, but the actor can no longer see all of them. At this point, in order for the play to function, the audience themselves must be allowed to become key conductors of the meaning of the performance.

Some, like the writer Mick Fealty, have stressed a close analogy between Gregory's description of the rudimentary dynamics of theater-in-the-round with the network effect of Internet-based communication in comparison to traditional broadcast and marketing channels.