Weekly Results
| Elimination chart | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |||
| Yasmina | IN | WIN | IN | BR | IN | IN | IN | WIN | IN | WIN | IN | HIRED | |||
| Kate | IN | IN | IN | IN | WIN | IN | BR | IN | IN | BR | IN | RUNNER-UP | |||
| Debra | BR | IN | WIN | IN | IN | BR | IN | LOSE | BR | IN | FIRED | ||||
| Lorraine | IN | IN | IN | IN | BR | IN | LOSE | IN | WIN | BR | FIRED | ||||
| James | IN | BR | LOSE | IN | IN | IN | IN | BR | LOSE | IN | FIRED | ||||
| Howard | WIN | BR | IN | IN | IN | IN | IN | IN | IN | FIRED | |||||
| Ben | IN | IN | BR | BR | IN | LOSE | IN | IN | FIRED | ||||||
| Mona | LOSE | IN | IN | IN | IN | IN | WIN | FIRED | |||||||
| Philip | IN | IN | IN | IN | BR | WIN | FIRED | ||||||||
| Noorul | IN | IN | IN | WIN | IN | FIRED | |||||||||
| Kimberly | IN | IN | IN | IN | FIRED | ||||||||||
| Paula | IN | IN | IN | FIRED | |||||||||||
| Majid | IN | IN | FIRED | ||||||||||||
| Rocky | IN | FIRED | |||||||||||||
| Anita | FIRED | ||||||||||||||
| Adam | LEFT | ||||||||||||||
- The candidate was on the winning team (or, in Week 11, managed to avoid being fired.)
- The candidate was on the losing team.
- The candidate was hired and won The Apprentice.
- The candidate was the runner-up.
- The candidate won as project manager on his/her team.
- The candidate lost as project manager on his/her team.
- The candidate was brought to the final boardroom.
- The candidate was fired.
- The candidate lost as project manager and was fired.
- The candidate left the competition before it started.
Read more about this topic: The Apprentice (UK Series Five)
Famous quotes containing the words weekly and/or results:
“True love never goes without respect; and its counterfeit is often obliged to feign it, till an occasion serves to throw it out of the windows.”
—Anonymous, U.S. women’s magazine contributor. Weekly Visitor or Ladies Miscellany, p. 211 (April 1803)
“There is not a single rule, however plausible, and however firmly grounded in epistemology, that is not violated at some time or other. It becomes evident that such violations are not accidental events, they are not results of insufficient knowledge or of inattention which might have been avoided. On the contrary, we see that they are necessary for progress.”
—Paul Feyerabend (1924–1994)