Test Method Validation
Test methods are often scrutinized for their validity, applicability, and accuracy. It is very important that the scope of the test method be clearly defined, and any aspect included in the scope is shown to be accurate and repeatable through validation.
Test method validations often encompass the following considerations:
- Accuracy and precision: Demonstration of accuracy may require the creation of a reference value if none is yet available.
- Repeatability and Reproducibility, sometimes in the form of a Gauge R&R.
- Range, or a continuum scale over which the test method would be considered accurate. Example: 10 N to 100 N force test.
- Measurement resolution, be it spatial, temporal, or otherwise.
- Curve fitting, typically for linearity, which justifies interpolation between calibrated reference points.
- Robustness, or the insensitivity to potentially subtle variables in the test environment or setup which may be difficult to control.
- Usefulness to predict end-use characteristics and performance
- Measurement uncertainty
- Interlaboratory or round robin tests
- other types of measurement systems analysis
Read more about this topic: Test Method
Famous quotes containing the words test and/or method:
“[17th-century] Puritans were the first modern parents. Like many of us, they looked on their treatment of children as a test of their own self-control. Their goal was not to simply to ensure the child’s duty to the family, but to help him or her make personal, individual commitments. They were the first authors to state that children must obey God rather than parents, in case of a clear conflict.”
—C. John Sommerville (20th century)
“Traditional scientific method has always been at the very best 20-20 hindsight. It’s good for seeing where you’ve been. It’s good for testing the truth of what you think you know, but it can’t tell you where you ought to go.”
—Robert M. Pirsig (b. 1928)