Taukei Ni Waluvu - Past Title Holders

Past Title Holders

(in order of succession)

Vunivalu Taukei Waiburebure

  • Robonowai I (Nalawa)
  • Rokovucago I (Navunidakua)
  • Nayacakuru (Navunidakua)
  • Rokowai I(c.1600 AD Nakamarusi)
  • Rokotokalau (Ulira)
  • Ronaiteqe (Taulevu)
  • Iranabobo I(Ulira)
  • Rovucago II (Navaulele)
  • Roraiova I,(Valu ni Lulu- Navaulele)
  • Robaledrokadroka I, (Taulevu)
  • Rodavetanivalu I, (Taulevu)
  • Iranabobo II(Ulira)

Vunivalu Vuniduba

  • Asaeli Tabuavula

Vunivalu Taukei ni Waluvu

  • Ratu Meli Davetanivalu II, Navaulele (?-1875).
  • Ratu Jone Roraiova II, (Taukei Nakacadakui)
  • Ratu Viliame Robatiratu I(?-1908) (Taukei Vuravura, Buli Colo East, GCC Member)
  • Ratu Alipate Baledrokadroka II, (Taukei Navaulele)
  • Ratu Samu Ranarogo (1855–1931).
  • Dr. Ratu Temesia Robonowai II, NMP, (Taukei Nakamarusi, 1866–1937, GCC Member)
  • Ratu Taito Rauluni (1880–1948).
  • Ratu Manasa Davetanivalu II,(1893–1944, GCC Member)
  • Ratu Isikeli Roraqoca (Buli Matailobau) (1906–62, GCC Member)
  • Ratu Anare Roraqoca (1903–74, GCC Member)
  • Ratu Joseva Koroitamana (1909–87).
  • Ratu Esira Rovucago VI(1911–77).
  • Ratu Emosi Vakatawabai (1915–79, GCC Member)
  • Ratu Jope Rokowai (1923–97, GCC Member)
  • Ratu Alipate Raiova Baledrokadroka IV, (1933–2005, Taukei Nacagabuli, Senator, GCC Member)
  • Ratu Meli Ronaiteqe Koroitamana (1935–2009, GCC Member)

Read more about this topic:  Taukei Ni Waluvu

Famous quotes containing the words title and/or holders:

    “Bolkenstein, a Minister, was speaking on the Dutch programme from London, and he said that they ought to make a collection of diaries and letters after the war. Of course, they all made a rush at my diary immediately. Just imagine how interesting it would be if I were to publish a romance of the “Secret Annexe.” The title alone would be enough to make people think it was a detective story.”
    —Anne Frank (1929–1945)

    “The doctrine of those who have denied that certainty could be attained at all, has some agreement with my way of proceeding at the first setting out; but they end in being infinitely separated and opposed. For the holders of that doctrine assert simply that nothing can be known; I also assert that not much can be known in nature by the way which is now in use. But then they go on to destroy the authority of the senses and understanding; whereas I proceed to devise helps for the same.”
    —Francis Bacon (1560–1626)