Suzuki Cultus - First Generation

First generation
Also called Suzuki SA-310/SA-413
Suzuki Swift
Suzuki Khyber
Suzuki Forsa
Holden Barina
Chevrolet Sprint/Sprint Metro
Pontiac Firefly (Canada)
Isuzu Geminett (JDM)
Production 1983–1988
Assembly Kosai, Japan
Bogotá, Colombia
Nairobi, Kenya
Pekan, Malaysia (DRB-HICOM)
Quito, Ecuador (Aymesa)
Body style 3-door hatchback
5-door hatchback
Layout FF layout
Wheelbase 3-door: 2,245 mm (88.4 in)
5-Door: 2,345 mm (92.3 in)
Length 3-door: 3,585 mm (141.1 in)
Export: 3,670 mm (144.5 in)
5-Door: 3,685 mm (145.1 in)
Export: 3,770 mm (148.4 in)
Width 1,530 mm (60.2 in)
Export: 1,545 mm (60.8 in)
Height 1,350 mm (53.1 in)
Curb weight 620 kg (1,367 lb)-750 kg (1,653 lb)

The first generation of the Cultus was designed and developed by Suzuki for the Japanese Domestic Market (JDM) and introduced as the 1983 SA310, the name shortly thereafter changed to Cultus. GM and Suzuki had formed an alliance in 1981, and so GM was able to market the Cultus as a captive import, introducing it to the North American market as the 1985 Chevrolet Sprint. Beginning in 1985, Cooper Motor Corporation (CMC) of Nairobi, Kenya, also assembled the SA310.

Nameplate Market Body
1983–1988 Suzuki Cultus Japan 3/5 a.
1985–1988 Suzuki Forsa Canada 3/5 b.
1985–1988 Chevrolet Sprint N. America 3/5 c.
1987–2004 Chevrolet Sprint Colombia 5 d.
1985–1988 Holden Barina Australia 5
1985–1988 Pontiac Firefly Canada 3/5

3= 3-dr hatchback
5= 5-dr hatchback
a. Initially marketed as the SA-310
b. Also Hawaii, Guam, N. Marianas and test marketing USA 48 states.
c. Canada's "Chevrolet" Sprint model ran through 1991
d. Manufactured at GM Colmotores, Bogotá, Colombia

Read more about this topic:  Suzuki Cultus

Famous quotes containing the word generation:

    “Progress is the injustice each generation commits with regard to its predecessors.”
    —E.M. Cioran (b. 1911)

    “There may perhaps be a new generation of doctors horrified by lacerations, infections, women who have douched with kitchen cleanser. What an irony it would be if fanatics continued to kill and yet it was the apathy and silence of the medical profession that most wounded the ability to provide what is, after all, a medical procedure.”
    —Anna Quindlen (b. 1952)