Streamlined System For The Romanization of Bulgarian - Informal Writing

Informal Writing

Sometimes, especially in e-mail or text messaging, the Cyrillic alphabet is not available and people are forced to write in Roman script. This often does not follow the official or any other of the standards listed above, but rather is an idiosyncratic Bulgarian form of text speak. While most letters are straightforward, several can take different forms. The letter variants listed below are often used interchangeably with some or all of the above standards, often in the same sentence.

Cyrillic letter Latin variant Examples Notes
ж j darja
(държа, hold)
ч 4 4e
(че, that),
The number "4" is chetiri; the shapes of "Ч" and "4" are also similar.
ш 6 Mi6o
(Мишо, Mike)
The number "6" is shest.
щ 6t 6te
(ще, will)
ъ y Bylgaria
(Bulgaria)
я q Bylgariq
(Bulgaria)

There is no set rule, and people often vary the combinations within a single message, so that "ъ" may be presented as "u", "a" or "y" in three adjacent words, and "щ" can be "sht" in one word, and "6t" in the next. Conversely, "j" could be used to represent "й", "ж" and even "дж" in adjacent words, while "y" can be used for "ъ" in one word and for "й" in the next.

This unofficial email/SMS language is often referred to as "shlyokavitsa". The use of Latinised Bulgarian, while ubiquitous in personal communication, is frowned upon in certain internet contexts, and many websites' comment sections and internet forums have rules stating that posts in Roman script will be deleted.

Read more about this topic:  Streamlined System For The Romanization Of Bulgarian

Famous quotes containing the words informal and/or writing:

    We are now a nation of people in daily contact with strangers. Thanks to mass transportation, school administrators and teachers often live many miles from the neighborhood schoolhouse. They are no longer in daily informal contact with parents, ministers, and other institution leaders . . . [and are] no longer a natural extension of parental authority.
    James P. Comer (20th century)

    There is a difference between dramatizing your sensibility and your personality. The literary works which we think of as classics did the former. Much modern writing does the latter, and so has an affinity with, say, night-club acts in all their shoddy immediacy.
    Paul Horgan (b. 1904)