Contribution To Economics and China's Economic Development
Chueng's contribution to economics and China's economic development can be roughly grouped in the following areas,
- New Institutional Economics
- how different kinds of contractual arrangement affect transaction costs, which are often ignored by neoclassical economists
- realizing the importance of transaction costs (as Cheung often mentions in his writings, if there is no transaction costs (the original starting point assumption by Coase), there is no difference in using different institutional arrangements (e.g. market or government)).
- the nature of the firm (a government, to a certain extent, is a firm and can be more efficient than the market in some areas),
- Methodology
- emphasis on economic explanation (according to Cheung, economic explanation is the ONLY objective of the study of economics);
- the analysis of relevant and observable real world constraints: Adam Smith's tradition,
- downward sloping demand curve: Neoclassical tradition,
- theories must be potentially refutable but not yet refuted (Cheung considers many mainstream concepts not observable, leading to the non-refutable nature of many theories (such as utilities, welfare))
- focus on capturing the underlying and relevant constraints to explain economic phenomena that might seem odd and strange on the surface.
- China's economic development
- Considerable influence among the Chinese speaking population (most of his work after 1982 are written in Chinese);
- Prediction of China's institutional reform (which, in general, has been quite accurate)
- Analysis of the deficiencies in the Chinese state owned enterprises
Read more about this topic: Steven N. S. Cheung
Famous quotes containing the words contribution to, contribution, economics, china, economic and/or development:
“He left behind, as his essential contribution to literature, a large repertoire of jokes which survive because of their sheer neatness, and because of a certain intriguing uncertainty—which extends to Wilde himself—as to whether they really mean anything.”
—George Orwell (1903–1950)
“Advertising is a racket, like the movies and the brokerage business. You cannot be honest without admitting that its constructive contribution to humanity is exactly minus zero.”
—F. Scott Fitzgerald (1896–1940)
“The new sound-sphere is global. It ripples at great speed across languages, ideologies, frontiers and races.... The economics of this musical esperanto is staggering. Rock and pop breed concentric worlds of fashion, setting and life-style. Popular music has brought with it sociologies of private and public manner, of group solidarity. The politics of Eden come loud.”
—George Steiner (b. 1929)
“It all ended with the circuslike whump of a monstrous box on the ear with which I knocked down the traitress who rolled up in a ball where she had collapsed, her eyes glistening at me through her spread fingers—all in all quite flattered, I think. Automatically, I searched for something to throw at her, saw the china sugar bowl I had given her for Easter, took the thing under my arm and went out, slamming the door.”
—Vladimir Nabokov (1899–1977)
“We have heard all of our lives how, after the Civil War was over, the South went back to straighten itself out and make a living again. It was for many years a voiceless part of the government. The balance of power moved away from it—to the north and the east. The problems of the north and the east became the big problem of the country and nobody paid much attention to the economic unbalance the South had left as its only choice.”
—Lyndon Baines Johnson (1908–1973)
“Dissonance between family and school, therefore, is not only inevitable in a changing society; it also helps to make children more malleable and responsive to a changing world. By the same token, one could say that absolute homogeneity between family and school would reflect a static, authoritarian society and discourage creative, adaptive development in children.”
—Sara Lawrence Lightfoot (20th century)