Ends of Graphs
Let Γ be a connected graph where the degree of every vertex is finite. One can view Γ as a topological space by giving it the natural structure of a one-dimensional cell complex. Then the ends of Γ are the ends of this topological space. A more explicit definition of the number of ends of a graph is presented below for completeness.
Let n ≥ 0 be a non-negative integer. The graph Γ is said to satisfy e(Γ) ≤ n if for every finite collection F of edges of Γ the graph Γ − F has at most n infinite connected components. By definition, e(Γ) = m if e(Γ) ≤ m and if for every 0 ≤ n < m the statement e(Γ) ≤ n is false. Thus e(Γ) = m if m is the smallest nonnegative integer n such that e(Γ) ≤ n. If there does not exist an integer n ≥ 0 such that e(Γ) ≤ n, put e(Γ) = ∞. The number e(Γ) is called the number of ends of Γ.
Informally, e(Γ) is the number of "connected components at infinity" of Γ. If e(Γ) = m < ∞, then for any finite set F of edges of Γ there exists a finite set K of edges of Γ with F ⊆ K such that Γ − F has exactly m infinite connected components. If e(Γ) = ∞, then for any finite set F of edges of Γ and for any integer n ≥ 0 there exists a finite set K of edges of Γ with F ⊆ K such that Γ − K has at least n infinite connected components.
Read more about this topic: Stallings Theorem About Ends Of Groups
Famous quotes containing the words ends of and/or ends:
“Great Negative, how vainly would the Wise
Enquire, define, distinguish, teach, devise,
Didst thou not stand to point their dull Philosophies?
Is, or is not, the two great Ends of Fate,
And, true or false, the Subject of Debate,
That perfect, or destroy, the vast Designs of Fate,”
—John Wilmot, 2d Earl Of Rochester (19091969)
“A third variety of drama ... begins as tragedy with scraps of fun in it ... and ends in comedy without mirth in it, the place of mirth being taken by a more or less bitter and critical irony.”
—George Bernard Shaw (18561950)