Stable Module Category - Definition

Definition

Let R be a ring. For two modules M and N, define to be the set of R-linear maps from M to N modulo the relation that f ~ g if fg factors through a projective module. The stable module category is defined by setting the objects to be the R-modules, and the morphisms are the equivalence classes .

Given a module M, let P be a projective module with a surjection . Then set to be the kernel of p. Suppose we are given a morphism and a surjection where Q is projective. Then one can lift f to a map which maps into . This gives a well-defined functor from the stable module category to itself.

For certain rings, such as Frobenius algebras, is an equivalence of categories. In this case, the inverse can be defined as follows. Given M, find an injective module I with an inclusion . Then is defined to be the cokernel of i. A case of particular interest is when the ring R is a group algebra.

The functor Ω−1 can even be defined on the module category of a general ring (without factoring out projectives), as the cokernel of the injective envelope. It need not be true in this case that the functor Ω−1 is actually an inverse to Ω. One important property of the stable module category is it allows defining the Ω functor for general rings. When R is perfect (or M is finitely generated and R is semiperfect), then Ω(M) can be defined as the kernel of the projective cover, giving a functor on the module category. However, in general projective covers need not exist, and so passing to the stable module category is necessary.

Read more about this topic:  Stable Module Category

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    The physicians say, they are not materialists; but they are:MSpirit is matter reduced to an extreme thinness: O so thin!—But the definition of spiritual should be, that which is its own evidence. What notions do they attach to love! what to religion! One would not willingly pronounce these words in their hearing, and give them the occasion to profane them.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    Was man made stupid to see his own stupidity?
    Is God by definition indifferent, beyond us all?
    Is the eternal truth man’s fighting soul
    Wherein the Beast ravens in its own avidity?
    Richard Eberhart (b. 1904)

    ... we all know the wag’s definition of a philanthropist: a man whose charity increases directly as the square of the distance.
    George Eliot [Mary Ann (or Marian)