Stability and Growth Pact - Member States By SGP Criteria

Member States By SGP Criteria

The deficit and debt criterion is applied to both Eurozone and non-Eurozone EU member states. Data in the table are for the fiscal year 2011, being published as part of the European Commission's economic forecast in May 2012. And the past years with SGP breaches, were identified by the annexed table 53B and 55B from the report.


criteria breach
Fiscal data for 2011 Budget deficit to GDP Debt-to-GDP ratio Breaches of the
deficit/debt rule
Deadline for
compliance
with SGP
Reference value max. 3.0% max. 60.0%
Austria 2.6% 072.2% 1998-99, 2001, 2004, 2008−current 2013
Belgium 3.7% 098.0% 2008−current 2012
Bulgaria 2.1% 016.3% 2009−10 Comply
Cyprus 6.3% 071.6% 1998-99, 2001–04, 2009-current 2012
Czech Republic 3.1% 041.2% 1998-2003, 2005, 2009-current 2013
Denmark 1.8% 046.5% No breaches1 2013
Estonia -1.0% 006.0% 1999 Comply
Finland 0.5% 048.6% No breaches1 Comply
France 5.2% 085.8% 2002-05, 2007-current 2013
Germany 1.0% 081.2% 1998-99, 2002–05, 2008–10 Comply
Greece 9.1% 165.3% 1998-current 2014
Hungary -4.3% 080.6% 1998-99, 2001–10 2012
Ireland 13.1% 108.2% 2008-current 2015
Italy 3.9% 120.1% 2001-06, 2008-current 2012
Latvia 3.5% 042.6% 1999, 2008-current 2012
Lithuania 5.5% 038.5% 2000-01, 2008-current 2012
Luxembourg 0.6% 018.2% No breaches Comply
Malta 2.7% 072.0% 1998-2004, 2008-current 2011
Netherlands 4.7% 065.2% 2003, 2009-current 2013
Poland 5.1% 056.3% 1998, 2001–06, 2008-current 2012
Portugal 4.2% 107.8% 1998-current 2014
Romania 5.2% 033.3% 1998-2001, 2008-current 2012
Slovakia 4.8% 043.3% 1998-2002, 2006, 2009-current 2013
Slovenia 6.4% 047.6% 2000-01, 2009-current 2013
Spain 8.5% 068.5% 2008-current 2014
Sweden -0.3% 038.4% No breaches Comply
United Kingdom 8.3% 085.7% 2003-05, 2008-current 2014 (FY)
Eurozone 17 4.1% 088.0% 2003-05, 2008-current
EU27 4.5% 083.0% 2003-05, 2008-current

Read more about this topic:  Stability And Growth Pact

Famous quotes containing the words member, states and/or criteria:

    I wish to speak a word for Nature, for absolute freedom and wildness, as contrasted with a freedom and culture merely civil,—to regard man as an inhabitant, or a part and parcel of Nature, rather than as a member of society. I wish to make an extreme statement, if so I may make an emphatic one, for there are enough champions of civilization: the minister and the school committee and every one of you will take care of that.
    Henry David David (1817–1862)

    In it he proves that all things are true and states how the truths of all contradictions may be reconciled physically, such as for example that white is black and black is white; that one can be and not be at the same time; that there can be hills without valleys; that nothingness is something and that everything, which is, is not. But take note that he proves all these unheard-of paradoxes without any fallacious or sophistical reasoning.
    Savinien Cyrano De Bergerac (1619–1655)

    Every sign is subject to the criteria of ideological evaluation.... The domain of ideology coincides with the domain of signs. They equate with one another. Wherever a sign is present, ideology is present, too. Everything ideological possesses semiotic value.
    —V.N. (Valintin Nikolaevic)