Uniqueness of Square Roots in General Rings
In a ring we call an element b a square root of a iff b2 = a.
In an integral domain, suppose the element a has some square root b, so b2 = a. Then this square root is not necessarily unique, but it is "almost unique" in the following sense: If x too is a square root of a, then x2 = a = b2. So x2 – b2 = 0, or, by commutativity, (x + b)(x – b) = 0. Because there are no zero divisors in the integral domain, we conclude that one factor is zero, and x = ±b. The square root of a, if it exists, is therefore unique up to a sign, in integral domains.
To see that the square root need not be unique up to sign in a general ring, consider the ring from modular arithmetic. Here, the element 1 has four distinct square roots, namely ±1 and ±3. On the other hand, the element 2 has no square root. See also the article quadratic residue for details.
Another example is provided by the quaternions in which the element −1 has an infinitude of square roots including ±i, ±j, and ±k.
In fact, the set of square roots of −1 is exactly
Hence this set is exactly the same size and shape as the (surface of the) unit sphere in 3-space.
Read more about this topic: Square Root
Famous quotes containing the words uniqueness of, uniqueness, square, roots, general and/or rings:
“Somehow we have been taught to believe that the experiences of girls and women are not important in the study and understanding of human behavior. If we know men, then we know all of humankind. These prevalent cultural attitudes totally deny the uniqueness of the female experience, limiting the development of girls and women and depriving a needy world of the gifts, talents, and resources our daughters have to offer.”
—Jeanne Elium (20th century)
“Somehow we have been taught to believe that the experiences of girls and women are not important in the study and understanding of human behavior. If we know men, then we know all of humankind. These prevalent cultural attitudes totally deny the uniqueness of the female experience, limiting the development of girls and women and depriving a needy world of the gifts, talents, and resources our daughters have to offer.”
—Jeanne Elium (20th century)
“O for a man who is a man, and, as my neighbor says, has a bone in his back which you cannot pass your hand through! Our statistics are at fault: the population has been returned too large. How many men are there to a square thousand miles in this country? Hardly one.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“To the young mind, every thing is individual, stands by itself. By and by, it finds how to join two things, and see in them one nature; then three, then three thousand; and so, tyrannized over by its own unifying instinct, it goes on tying things together, diminishing anomalies, discovering roots running underground, whereby contrary and remote things cohere, and flower out from one stem.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“A private should preserve a respectful attitude toward his superiors, and should seldom or never proceed so far as to offer suggestions to his general in the field. If the battle is not being conducted to suit him, it is better for him to resign. By the etiquette of war, it is permitted to none below the rank of newspaper correspondent to dictate to the general in the field.”
—Mark Twain [Samuel Langhorne Clemens] (1835–1910)
“You held my hand
and were instant to explain
the three rings of danger.”
—Anne Sexton (1928–1974)