Definition
Let us first introduce the local Lorentz frame fields or vierbein (also known as a tetrad), this is basically four orthogonal space time vector fields labeled by . Orthogonal meaning
where is the inverse matrix of is the spacetime metric and is the Minkowski metric. Here, capital letters denote the local Lorentz frame indices; Greek indices denote general coordinate indices. The spacetime metric can be expressed by
which simply expresses that, when written in terms of the basis, is locally flat.
The spin connection defines a covariant derivative on generalized tensors. For example its actin on is
where is the affine connection. The connection is said to be compatible to the vierbein if it satisfies
The spin connection is then given by:
where we have introduced the dual-vierbein satisfying and . We expect that will also annihilate the Minkowski metric ,
This implies that the connection is anti-symmetric in its internal indices, .
By substituting the formula for the affine connection written in terms of the, the spin connection can be written entirely in terms of the ,
To directly solve the compatibility condition for the spin connection, one can use the same trick that was used to solve for the affine connection . First contract the compatibility condition to give
.
Then, do a cyclic permutation of the free indices and, and add and subtract the three resulting equations:
where we have used the definition . The solution for the spin connection is
.
From this we obtain the same formula as before.
Read more about this topic: Spin Connection
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“The physicians say, they are not materialists; but they are:MSpirit is matter reduced to an extreme thinness: O so thin!But the definition of spiritual should be, that which is its own evidence. What notions do they attach to love! what to religion! One would not willingly pronounce these words in their hearing, and give them the occasion to profane them.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)
“Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
—Walter Pater (18391894)
“... we all know the wags definition of a philanthropist: a man whose charity increases directly as the square of the distance.”
—George Eliot [Mary Ann (or Marian)