Structure
Sonnet 32 is written in the English (Shakespearean) form. It consists of 14 lines: 3 quatrains followed by a couplet. The metrical line is iambic pentameter and the rhyming scheme is abab cdcd efef gg. Literary critic George Wright observes how iambic pentameter, "however highly patterned its syntax, is by nature asymmetrical – like human speech”. Thus, the organization of a sonnet exists so that meaning may be found it its variation.
The purpose of a Shakespearean couplet is to analyze and summarize the author’s experience, as well as, to describe and enact it. In regards to the relationship of quatrain to couplet, "one must distinguish the fictive speaker (even when he represents himself as a poet) from Shakespeare the author". This is particularly significant in Sonnet 32 because the fictive author reflects on his ability to write poetry.
It’s also important to note how the structure of Sonnet 32 can be interpreted in light of its relationship to time. "The exact match created between events as foreseen by the poet (his death, the increasing poetic sophistication of the age and consequently of the beloved’s taste) and the beloved’s conjectured thought as he rereads the poet’s verse makes intelligible Shakespeare’s choice of a structure of superposition (in which lines 9-14 repeat lines 3-8 )."
Read more about this topic: Sonnet 32
Famous quotes containing the word structure:
“There is no such thing as a language, not if a language is anything like what many philosophers and linguists have supposed. There is therefore no such thing to be learned, mastered, or born with. We must give up the idea of a clearly defined shared structure which language-users acquire and then apply to cases.”
—Donald Davidson (b. 1917)
“The structure was designed by an old sea captain who believed that the world would end in a flood. He built a home in the traditional shape of the Ark, inverted, with the roof forming the hull of the proposed vessel. The builder expected that the deluge would cause the house to topple and then reverse itself, floating away on its roof until it should land on some new Ararat.”
—For the State of New Jersey, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)
“Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.”
—Paul Tillich (1886–1965)