Speaker and Subject
Shakespeare’s sonnets are typically classified in reference to speaker and subject. Sonnet 32 is commonly accepted as a “handsome youth” sonnet. This classification as a handsome youth sonnet is significant as it characterizes both the speaker and the subject within the sonnet: the speaker, as a man displaying his affection for the subject who is a young, handsome man.
The identity of the speaker is a well debated topic however. Some believe that the speaker is merely a character that Shakespeare has created as an expression of art. However, the speaker is often thought to be Shakespeare himself, thus giving the content of the sonnet a much more personal sentiment. Some depict the voice of the speaker merely as a “construct” character by the author to “generate…reader interest, sympathy, and involvement that deserve closer attention”. Thus the speaker is not a reflection of the author but instead an authorial tool to evoke interest from the reader.
In contrast, some critics believe that Shakespeare’s sonnets are “autobiograph” and that the two characters within the sonnet are Shakespeare and an unidentified male object of lust or affection.
Ultimately, there is “critical disagreement” over whether the character of Shakespeare’s speaker is ambiguous, Shakespeare himself, or a constructed character.
Read more about this topic: Sonnet 32
Famous quotes containing the words speaker and, speaker and/or subject:
“For, though the origin of most of our words is forgotten, each word was at first a stroke of genius, and obtained currency, because for the moment it symbolized the world to the first speaker and to the hearer. The etymologist finds the deadest word to have been once a brilliant picture.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“There is also this benefit in brag, that the speaker is unconsciously expressing his own ideal. Humor him by all means, draw it all out, and hold him to it.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“Biography, in its purer form, confined to the ended lives of the true and brave, may be held the fairest meed of human virtue—one given and received in entire disinterestedness—since neither can the biographer hope for acknowledgment from the subject, not the subject at all avail himself of the biographical distinction conferred.”
—Herman Melville (1819–1891)