Smoothing Spline - Definition

Definition

Let be a sequence of observations, modeled by the relation . The smoothing spline estimate of the function is defined to be the minimizer (over the class of twice differentiable functions) of

\sum_{i=1}^n (Y_i - \hat\mu(x_i))^2 + \lambda \int_{x_1}^{x_n} \hat\mu''(x)^2 \,dx.

Remarks:

  1. is a smoothing parameter, controlling the trade-off between fidelity to the data and roughness of the function estimate.
  2. The integral is evaluated over the range of the .
  3. As (no smoothing), the smoothing spline converges to the interpolating spline.
  4. As (infinite smoothing), the roughness penalty becomes paramount and the estimate converges to a linear least squares estimate.
  5. The roughness penalty based on the second derivative is the most common in modern statistics literature, although the method can easily be adapted to penalties based on other derivatives.
  6. In early literature, with equally-spaced, second or third-order differences were used in the penalty, rather than derivatives.
  7. When the sum-of-squares term is replaced by a log-likelihood, the resulting estimate is termed penalized likelihood. The smoothing spline is the special case of penalized likelihood resulting from a Gaussian likelihood.

Read more about this topic:  Smoothing Spline

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    “According to our social pyramid, all men who feel displaced racially, culturally, and/or because of economic hardships will turn on those whom they feel they can order and humiliate, usually women, children, and animals—just as they have been ordered and humiliated by those privileged few who are in power. However, this definition does not explain why there are privileged men who behave this way toward women.”
    —Ana Castillo (b. 1953)

    “Perhaps the best definition of progress would be the continuing efforts of men and women to narrow the gap between the convenience of the powers that be and the unwritten charter.”
    —Nadine Gordimer (b. 1923)

    “Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
    —Walter Pater (1839–1894)