Sister Suffragette - Original Version

Original Version

The melody from this song was borrowed from an earlier song entitled, "Practically Perfect" which had, by then, been deleted from the 1964 film production. According to the songwriters in their autobigraphical book, Walt's Time, Actress Glynis Johns had thought that she was being offered the lead role of "Mary Poppins", when in fact, she had been slotted to play, "Mrs. Banks", instead. To amplify Disney's and Johns' mutual embarrassment, the misunderstanding only became apparent while both parties sat opposite each other in Walt Disney's Burbank studio lot office. Thinking quickly, Disney softened the actress's disappointment by telling her of the 'terrific new song' which the Sherman Brothers had written, especially for her. Disney called up the songwriters, telling them how he was 'just about to take Johns to lunch and how she was looking forward to hearing the new song following the meal", all within earshot of the actress. The Sherman Brothers deciphered Disney's coded hint, working feverishly through their own lunch hour. Originally the lyrics for "Practically Perfect" read:

"I'm Practically Perfect in ev'ry way
In ev'rything I do and in ev'rything I say"

In record time, the lyric evolved into:

"We're clearly soldiers in petticoats
Dauntless crusaders for women's votes!"

The Mary Poppins stage musical contains a song entitled "Practically Perfect" which is based heavily on the original but contains none of the tune. The replacement song is instead called "Being Mrs. Banks".

Read more about this topic:  Sister Suffragette

Famous quotes containing the words original and/or version:

    The Spacious Firmament on high,
    With all the blue Ethereal Sky,
    And spangled Heav’ns, a Shining Frame,
    Their great Original proclaim:
    Th’ unwearied Sun, from day to day,
    Does his Creator’s Pow’r display,
    And publishes to every Land
    The Work of an Almighty Hand.
    Joseph Addison (1672–1719)

    Truth cannot be defined or tested by agreement with ‘the world’; for not only do truths differ for different worlds but the nature of agreement between a world apart from it is notoriously nebulous. Rather—speaking loosely and without trying to answer either Pilate’s question or Tarski’s—a version is to be taken to be true when it offends no unyielding beliefs and none of its own precepts.
    Nelson Goodman (b. 1906)