Sicamous Eagles - Season-by-season Record

Season-by-season Record

Note: GP = Games played, W = Wins, L = Losses, T = Ties, OTL = Overtime Losses, SOL = Shootout Losses, D = Defaults, Pts = Points, GF = Goals for, GA = Goals against

Season GP W L T SOL Pts GF GA Finish Playoffs
1994-95 44 36 8 0 72 261 144 1st, East KIJHL Champions
Cyclone Taylor Cup Champions
Season GP W L T OTL Pts GF GA Finish Playoffs
1995-96 42 35 6 1 71 299 140 1st, East Lost in Finals (Rebels)
1996-97 42 21 21 0 42 192 186 3rd, Eddie Mountain
1997-98 50 21 27 2 44 190 225 4th, Eddie Mountain
1998-99 52 31 19 2 64 218 197 2nd, Eddie Mountain
1999-00 46 28 14 4 60 210 164 2nd, Eddie Mountain Lost in Finals (Leafs)
2000-01 54 35 16 1 2 73 283 196 2nd, Eddie Mountain Lost in Division Finals, 3-4 (Grizzlies)
2001-02 50 43 5 1 1 88 330 148 1st, Okanagan Shuswap KIJHL Champions, 3-1 (Nitehawks)
Cyclone Taylor Cup Champions
Keystone Cup Champions
2002-03 50 42 5 1 2 87 257 114 1st, Okanagan Shuswap Lost in Finals, 0-3 (Nitehawks)
2003-04 50 31 12 4 3 69 240 146 2nd, Okanagan Shuswap Lost in Division Finals, 1-4 (Storm)
2004-05 50 32 16 1 1 66 218 158 2nd, Okanagan Shuswap Lost in Division Semifinals, 3-4 (Grizzlies)
2005-06 50 42 6 1 1 86 250 122 1st, Okanagan Shuswap KIJHL Champions, 4-1 (Nitehawks)
Season GP W L OTL D Pts GF GA Finish Playoffs
2006-07 52 20 24 8 48 170 201 4th, Okanagan Shuswap Lost in Division Semifinals, 1-4 (Storm)
2007-08 52 23 26 3 49 156 176 2nd, Eddie Mountain: East Lost in Division Finals, 3-4 (Grizzlies)
2008-09 52 26 20 6 58 184 177 2nd, Okanagan Lost in League Semifinals, 2-3 (Storm)
Season GP W L T OTL Pts GF GA Finish Playoffs
2009-10 50 31 15 0 4 66 214 165 3rd, Okanagan Lost in Division Finals, 0–4 (Posse)
2010-11 50 17 27 2 4 40 167 194 3rd, Doug Birks Lost in Division Semifinals, 1-4 (Storm)
2011-12 52 22 28 1 1 46 188 189 4th, Doug Birks Lost in Conference Finals, 1-4 (Chiefs)

Read more about this topic:  Sicamous Eagles

Famous quotes containing the word record:

    Yesterday the Electoral Commission decided not to go behind the papers filed with the Vice-President in the case of Florida.... I read the arguments in the Congressional Record and can’t see how lawyers can differ on the question. But the decision is by a strictly party vote—eight Republicans against seven Democrats! It shows the strength of party ties.
    Rutherford Birchard Hayes (1822–1893)