Seven-dimensional Cross Product - Consequences of The Defining Properties

Consequences of The Defining Properties

Given the three basic properties of (i) bilinearity, (ii) orthogonality and (iii) magnitude discussed in the section on definition, a nontrivial cross product exists only in three and seven dimensions. This restriction upon dimensionality can be shown by postulating the properties required for the cross product, then deducing a equation which is only satisfied when the dimension is 0, 1, 3 or 7. In zero dimensions there is only the zero vector, while in one dimension all vectors are parallel, so in both these cases a cross product must be identically zero.

The restriction to 0, 1, 3 and 7 dimensions is related to Hurwitz's theorem, that normed division algebras are only possible in 1, 2, 4 and 8 dimensions. The cross product is derived from the product of the algebra by considering the product restricted to the 0, 1, 3, or 7 imaginary dimensions of the algebra. Again discarding trivial products the product can only be defined this way in three and seven dimensions.

In contrast with three dimensions where the cross product is unique (apart from sign), there are many possible binary cross products in seven dimensions. One way to see this is to note that given any pair of vectors x and y ∈ ℝ7 and any vector v of magnitude |v| = |x||y| sinθ in the five dimensional space perpendicular to the plane spanned by x and y, it is possible to find a cross product with a multiplication table (and an associated set of basis vectors) such that x × y = v. That leaves open the question of just how many vector pairs like x and y can be matched to specified directions like v before the limitations of any particular table intervene.

Another difference between the three dimensional cross product and a seven dimensional cross product is:

“…for the cross product x × y in ℝ7 there are also other planes than the linear span of x and y giving the same direction as x × y” —Pertti Lounesto, Clifford algebras and spinors, p. 97

This statement is exemplified by every multiplication table, because any specific unit vector selected as a product occurs as a mapping from three different pairs of unit vectors, once with a plus sign and once with a minus sign. Each of these different pairs, of course, corresponds to another plane being mapped into the same direction.

Further properties follow from the definition, including the following identities:

  1. Anticommutativity:
    ,
  2. Scalar triple product:
  3. Malcev identity:

Other properties follow only in the three dimensional case, and are not satisfied by the seven dimensional cross product, notably,

  1. Vector triple product:
  2. Jacobi identity:

Read more about this topic:  Seven-dimensional Cross Product

Famous quotes containing the words consequences of the, consequences of, consequences, defining and/or properties:

    “There is not much that even the most socially responsible scientists can do as individuals, or even as a group, about the social consequences of their activities.”
    —Eric J. Hobsbawm (b. 1917)

    “Without being forgiven, released from the consequences of what we have done, our capacity to act would ... be confined to one single deed from which we could never recover; we would remain the victims of its consequences forever, not unlike the sorcerer’s apprentice who lacked the magic formula to break the spell.”
    —Hannah Arendt (1906–1975)

    “If you are prepared to accept the consequences of your dreams ... then you must still regard America today with the same naive enthusiasm as the generations that discovered the New World.”
    —Jean Baudrillard (b. 1929)

    “The U.S. is becoming an increasingly fatherless society. A generation ago, an American child could reasonably expect to grow up with his or her father. Today an American child can reasonably expect not to. Fatherlessness is now approaching a rough parity with fatherhood as a defining feature of American childhood.”
    —David Blankenhorn (20th century)

    “The reason why men enter into society, is the preservation of their property; and the end why they choose and authorize a legislative, is, that there may be laws made, and rules set, as guards and fences to the properties of all the members of the society: to limit the power, and moderate the dominion, of every part and member of the society.”
    —John Locke (1632–1704)