Explanation
Finally, Benjamin Radford, a managing editor of Skeptical Inquirer science magazine, a LiveScience columnist and author of hundreds of articles and several books on science, skepticism, and the paranormal, was invited at the request of The New Mexican to do research on the phenomenon. He believed the undetermined object was a piece of tree fluff or a spider or insect crawling across the camera lens. Having interacted with many similar ghost videos of this type, he said that the blurry video made it difficult to tell exactly what the image captured. Usually, the lower the quality of the image, the more likely the object is deemed to be a ghost. To find out what lay behind the mystery, he conducted two sets of experiments, including scattering the cotton from the cotton tree and using the insects. The first set appeared to be inconclusive, since the cotton didn’t make a glowing fluffy ball as the one in the ghost image. The second set using a bug, in the end, was more successful: Radford recreated an accurate "ghost" down to its color, size, shape and movement. It was agreed that the mystery had been solved thoroughly and the origin of the ghost was nothing more than a bug. A detailed report on Radford’s experiments was published in Skeptical Inquirer magazine's September/October issue that year.
Read more about this topic: Santa Fe Courthouse Ghost
Famous quotes containing the word explanation:
“Natural selection, the blind, unconscious, automatic process which Darwin discovered, and which we now know is the explanation for the existence and apparently purposeful form of all life, has no purpose in mind. It has no mind and no mind’s eye. It does not plan for the future. It has no vision, no foresight, no sight at all. If it can be said to play the role of the watchmaker in nature, it is the blind watchmaker.”
—Richard Dawkins (b. 1941)
“Are cans constitutionally iffy? Whenever, that is, we say that we can do something, or could do something, or could have done something, is there an if in the offing—suppressed, it may be, but due nevertheless to appear when we set out our sentence in full or when we give an explanation of its meaning?”
—J.L. (John Langshaw)
“Young children constantly invent new explanations to account for complex processes. And since their inventions change from week to week, furnishing the “correct” explanation is not quite so important as conveying a willingness to discuss the subject. Become an “askable parent.””
—Ruth Formanek (20th century)