Description
Most of the components of the Saiga are similar if not identical to an AK-47 rifle, but there are many cosmetic and functional differences between a Saiga and an AK-47. On the Saiga there is a notch that is used to secure the hand guard on to the front and a screw that is used to hold the hand guard in towards the rear. The 7.62x39 version Saiga is unable to accept standard AK-47 magazines; physically the magazine catch will not allow a magazine to lock into place inside of the receiver. Even if the magazine was modified to lock into place, cartridges may not feed well because the Saiga lacks a device called a bullet guide. The bullet guide allows a round to be stripped from the magazine and fed into the chamber without getting caught up on anything inside of the receiver; this bullet guide is specifically built into the magazine of the Saiga rifle. Any magazine that is used that does not have this feature may not feed reliably in the rifle.
Another difference of some later model Saigas is that they have a bolt hold open button. The Saiga bolt hold open is engaged by manually depressing a button by the trigger guard and pulling the charging handle rearward and does not automatically hold the rifle's action open after the last round is fired as seen on the AR-15. Some versions of the rifle lack a pistol grip and don't have a threaded muzzle, making it unable to accept muzzle devices. The trigger and trigger guard of some versions are placed farther back on the receiver than on a typical AK-47 rifle, and a transfer bar type system is used to release the hammer. This can result in the Saiga to have a considerably heavier and grittier trigger pull than that of other Kalashnikov-made firearms.
Read more about this topic: Saiga Semi-automatic Rifle
Famous quotes containing the word description:
“God damnit, why must all those journalists be such sticklers for detail? Why, they’d hold you to an accurate description of the first time you ever made love, expecting you to remember the color of the room and the shape of the windows.”
—Lyndon Baines Johnson (1908–1973)
“Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.”
—Paul Tillich (1886–1965)
“The great object in life is Sensation—to feel that we exist, even though in pain; it is this “craving void” which drives us to gaming, to battle, to travel, to intemperate but keenly felt pursuits of every description whose principal attraction is the agitation inseparable from their accomplishment.”
—George Gordon Noel Byron (1788–1824)