Presidents of Rutgers University
The following 19 individuals have served as President of Rutgers University from the creation of the office in 1655 to the present. Those enumerated below with their names emboldened graduated from Rutgers.
| President | Birth Year–Death Year | Years as President | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jacob Rutsen Hardenbergh | (1735–1790) | (1785–1790) |
| 2 | William Linn | (1752–1808) | (1791–1795) |
| 3 | Ira Condict | (1764–1811) | (1795–1810) |
| 4 | John Henry Livingston | (1746–1825) | (1810–1825) |
| 5 | Philip Milledoler | (1775–1852) | (1825–1840) |
| 6 | Abraham Bruyn Hasbrouck | (1791–1879) | (1840–1850) |
| 7 | Theodore Frelinghuysen | (1787–1862) | (1850–1862) |
| 8 | William Henry Campbell | (1808–1890) | (1862–1882) |
| 9 | Merrill Edward Gates | (1848–1922) | (1882–1890) |
| 10 | Austin Scott | (1848–1922) | (1891–1906) |
| 11 | William Henry Steele Demarest | (1863–1956) | (1906–1924) |
| 12 | John Martin Thomas | (1869–1952) | (1925–1930) |
| 13 | Philip Milledoler Brett | (1871–1960) | (1930–1931) |
| 14 | Robert Clarkson Clothier | (1885–1970) | (1932–1951) |
| 15 | Lewis Webster Jones | (1899–1975) | (1951–1958) |
| 16 | Mason Welch Gross | (1911–1977) | (1959–1971) |
| 17 | Edward J. Bloustein | (1925–1989) | (1971–1989) |
| 18 | Francis L. Lawrence | (b. 1937) | (1990–2002) |
| 19 | Richard Levis McCormick | (b. 1947) | (2002 – 2012) |
Read more about this topic: Rutgers University Faculty
Famous quotes containing the words presidents and/or university:
“Governments can err, Presidents do make mistakes, but the immortal Dante tells us that divine justice weighs the sins of the cold-blooded and the sins of the warm-hearted in different scales. Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the constant omission of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference.”
—Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882–1945)
“It is in the nature of allegory, as opposed to symbolism, to beg the question of absolute reality. The allegorist avails himself of a formal correspondence between “ideas” and “things,” both of which he assumes as given; he need not inquire whether either sphere is “real” or whether, in the final analysis, reality consists in their interaction.”
—Charles, Jr. Feidelson, U.S. educator, critic. Symbolism and American Literature, ch. 1, University of Chicago Press (1953)