Richard Gasquet - Performance Timeline

Performance Timeline

Current till the end of 2012 ATP World Tour.

Tournament 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 SR W–L
Grand Slam Tournaments
Australian Open A 1R 1R A 1R 4R 4R 3R 1R 3R 4R 0 / 9 13–9
French Open 1R 1R 1R 3R 2R 2R A A 1R 4R 4R 0 / 8 10–8
Wimbledon A A 1R 4R 1R SF 4R A A 4R 4R 0 / 7 17–7
US Open LQ A LQ 4R 4R 2R 1R 1R 4R 2R 4R 0 / 8 14–8
Win–Loss 0–1 0–2 0–3 8–3 4–4 10–3 6–3 2–2 3–3 9–4 12–4 0 / 32 54–32
Year-End Championship
ATP World Tour Finals A A A A A RR A A A A 0 / 1 1–2
ATP World Tour Masters 1000
Indian Wells Masters A A A A 4R 4R 4R 3R 1R QF 2R 0 / 7 10–7
Miami Masters A 1R A A 2R 3R 2R A 1R 3R 4R 0 / 7 4–7
Monte Carlo Masters 2R 1R LQ SF A QF 3R A 2R 3R A 0 / 7 12–7
Rome Masters A A A 2R A 2R 1R 3R A SF QF 0 / 6 11–6
Madrid Masters A A A A 2R 2R 3R A A 1R 3R 0 / 5 4–5
Hamburg Masters A A A F 1R 2R 2R NMS 0 / 4 6–4
Canada Masters A A A 2R F 2R QF A 1R 3R F 0 / 7 15–7
Cincinnati Masters A A A 2R 1R 2R 2R A 3R 3R 1R 0 / 7 6–7
Shanghai Masters Not Masters Series 1R 3R A 2R 0 / 3 3–3
Paris Masters LQ 1R LQ A 3R SF A A 2R 3R 2R 0 / 6 6–5
Win–Loss 1–1 0–3 0–0 12–5 9–6 11–9 8–8 3–3 6–7 15–8 12–8 0 / 59 77–58
Career Statistics
Titles–Finals 0–0 0–0 0–1 1–2 3–4 1–3 0–1 0–0 1–3 0–0 1–3 7 / 17 7–10
Hardcourt Win–Loss 0–0 2–5 4–4 7–4 14–12 29–13 18–13 19–13 20–14 19–12 27–15 1 / 102 159–105
Grass Win–Loss 0–1 0–0 0–2 11–2 6–2 7–3 6–3 0–0 2–0 3–1 4–3 2 / 18 39–17
Carpet Win–Loss 0–1 0–1 0–0 0–0 7–3 1–1 1–1 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 1 / 7 9–7
Clay Win–Loss 1–3 0–2 9–9 13–5 7–4 12–7 7–5 3–2 16–8 12–7 11–4 2 / 53 91–56
Overall Win–Loss 1–5 2–8 13–15 33–11 34–21 49–24 32–22 22–15 38–22 34–20 42–22 7 / 180 298–185
Win % 17% 20% 46% 75% 62% 67% 59% 59% 63% 63% 66% 61.7%
Year End Ranking 161 93 107 16 18 8 24 52 30 19 10 $5,980,716

Read more about this topic:  Richard Gasquet

Famous quotes containing the word performance:

    So long as the source of our identity is external—vested in how others judge our performance at work, or how others judge our children’s performance, or how much money we make—we will find ourselves hopelessly flawed, forever short of the ideal.
    Melinda M. Marshall (20th century)