Benefits
As mention before, the benefits of cluster development as opposed to a convention subdivision include: more preserved land for open/recreational space, a better setting for community building, possible local agriculture production, and an optimal arrangement in storm water management; furthermore cluster development makes more ecological and economical sense.
By clustering residential properties there is less impervious surface and more natural drainage which reduces storm water flooding, and soil erosion. As well, strategic areas in the extra space can be used trap nutrients and suspend runoff. Economical benefits include having fewer roads, sewer/drainage, and electric/gas utility infrastructure to construct. Also higher density means reduced travel time for services as well as the possibility for public transportation, increased bicycle usage, and pedestrianism. This subsequently would mean less petroleum usage, and Co2 emission; as well, there is the possibility of having community-supported agriculture (CSA) which decreases food miles and supports local economy. Higher density also has implications for an increase in recreation and community.
Read more about this topic: Residential Cluster Development
Famous quotes containing the word benefits:
“I do seriously believe that if we can measure among the States the benefits resulting from the preservation of the Union, the rebellious States have the larger share. It destroyed an institution that was their destruction. It opened the way for a commercial life that, if they will only embrace it and face the light, means to them a development that shall rival the best attainments of the greatest of our States.”
—Benjamin Harrison (1833–1901)
“Through all opposition the personal benefits of the reform [dress] [bracketed word in original] have compensated; but had it been mainly sacrifice, the thought of working for the amelioration of women and the elevation of humanity would still have been the beacon-star guiding me on amid all discouragements.”
—Susan Pecker Fowler (1823–1911)
“Unfortunately, we cannot rely solely on employers seeing that it is in their self-interest to change the workplace. Since the benefits of family-friendly policies are long-term, they may not be immediately visible or quantifiable; companies tend to look for success in the bottom line. On a deeper level, we are asking those in power to change the rules by which they themselves succeeded and with which they identify.”
—Anne C. Weisberg (20th century)