Expressing Properties of Binary Relations in RA
The following table shows how many of the usual properties of binary relations can be expressed as succinct RA equalities or inequalities. Below, an inequality of the form A≤B is shorthand for the Boolean equation A∨B = B.
The most complete set of results of this nature is chpt. C of Carnap (1958), where the notation is rather distant from that of this entry. Chpt. 3.2 of Suppes (1960) contains fewer results, presented as ZFC theorems and using a notation that more resembles that of this entry. Neither Carnap nor Suppes formulated their results using the RA of this entry, or in an equational manner.
| R is | If and only if: |
|---|---|
| Functional | R•R ≤ I |
| Total or Connected | I ≤ R•R (R is surjective) |
| Function | functional and total. |
| Injective |
R•R ≤ I (R is functional) |
| Surjective | I ≤ R•R (R is total) |
| Bijection | R•R = R•R = I (Injective surjective function) |
| Reflexive | I ≤ R |
| Coreflexive | R ≤ I |
| Irreflexive | R ∧ I = 0 |
| Transitive | R•R ≤ R |
| Preorder | R is reflexive and transitive. |
| Antisymmetric | R ∧ R ≤ I |
| Partial order | R is an antisymmetric preorder. |
| Total order | R is a total partial order. |
| Strict partial order | R is transitive and irreflexive. |
| Strict total order | R is a total strict partial order. |
| Symmetric | R = R |
| Equivalence | R•R = R. R is a symmetric preorder. |
| Asymmetric | R ≠ R |
| Dense | R ∧ I– ≤ (R ∧ I–)•(R ∧ I–). |
Read more about this topic: Relation Algebra
Famous quotes containing the words expressing, properties and/or relations:
“We sometimes think we dislike flattery, when we only dislike the manner of expressing it.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (16131680)
“A drop of water has the properties of the sea, but cannot exhibit a storm. There is beauty of a concert, as well as of a flute; strength of a host, as well as of a hero.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)
“I want relations which are not purely personal, based on purely personal qualities; but relations based upon some unanimous accord in truth or belief, and a harmony of purpose, rather than of personality. I am weary of personality.... Let us be easy and impersonal, not forever fingering over our own souls, and the souls of our acquaintances, but trying to create a new life, a new common life, a new complete tree of life from the roots that are within us.”
—D.H. (David Herbert)