Random Permutation Statistics - Expected Number of Cycles of A Given Size m

Expected Number of Cycles of A Given Size m

In this problem we use a bivariate generating function g(z, u) as described in the introduction. The value of b for a cycle not of size m is zero, and one for a cycle of size m. We have

\frac{\partial}{\partial u} g(z, u) \Bigg|_{u=1} = \frac{1}{1-z} \sum_{k\ge 1} b(k) \frac{z^k}{k} = \frac{1}{1-z} \frac{z^m}{m}

or

\frac{1}{m} z^m \; + \; \frac{1}{m} z^{m+1} \; + \; \frac{1}{m} z^{m+2} \; + \; \cdots

This means that the expected number of cycles of size m in a permutation of length n less than m is zero (obviously). A random permutation of length at least m contains on average 1/m cycles of length m. In particular, a random permutation contains about one fixed point.

The OGF of the expected number of cycles of length less than or equal to m is therefore

\frac{1}{1-z} \sum_{k=1}^m \frac{z^k}{k} \mbox{ and } \frac{1}{1-z} \sum_{k=1}^m \frac{z^k}{k} = H_m \mbox{ for } n \ge m

where Hm is the mth harmonic number. Hence the expected number of cycles of length at most m in a random permutation is about ln m.

Read more about this topic:  Random Permutation Statistics

Famous quotes containing the words expected, number, cycles and/or size:

    “I don’t think I can be expected to take seriously any game which takes less than three days to reach its conclusion.”
    —Tom Stoppard (b. 1937)

    “Again, the great number of cultivated men keep each other up to a high standard. The habit of meeting well-read and knowing men teaches the art of omission and selection.”
    —Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    “The stars which shone over Babylon and the stable in Bethlehem still shine as brightly over the Empire State Building and your front yard today. They perform their cycles with the same mathematical precision, and they will continue to affect each thing on earth, including man, as long as the earth exists.”
    —Linda Goodman (b. 1929)

    “There are obvious places in which government can narrow the chasm between haves and have-nots. One is the public schools, which have been seen as the great leveler, the authentic melting pot. That, today, is nonsense. In his scathing study of the nation’s public school system entitled “Savage Inequalities,” Jonathan Kozol made manifest the truth: that we have a system that discriminates against the poor in everything from class size to curriculum.”
    —Anna Quindlen (b. 1952)