Random Permutation Statistics - Expected Number of Cycles of A Given Size m

Expected Number of Cycles of A Given Size m

In this problem we use a bivariate generating function g(z, u) as described in the introduction. The value of b for a cycle not of size m is zero, and one for a cycle of size m. We have

\frac{\partial}{\partial u} g(z, u) \Bigg|_{u=1} = \frac{1}{1-z} \sum_{k\ge 1} b(k) \frac{z^k}{k} = \frac{1}{1-z} \frac{z^m}{m}

or

\frac{1}{m} z^m \; + \; \frac{1}{m} z^{m+1} \; + \; \frac{1}{m} z^{m+2} \; + \; \cdots

This means that the expected number of cycles of size m in a permutation of length n less than m is zero (obviously). A random permutation of length at least m contains on average 1/m cycles of length m. In particular, a random permutation contains about one fixed point.

The OGF of the expected number of cycles of length less than or equal to m is therefore

\frac{1}{1-z} \sum_{k=1}^m \frac{z^k}{k} \mbox{ and } \frac{1}{1-z} \sum_{k=1}^m \frac{z^k}{k} = H_m \mbox{ for } n \ge m

where Hm is the mth harmonic number. Hence the expected number of cycles of length at most m in a random permutation is about ln m.

Read more about this topic:  Random Permutation Statistics

Famous quotes containing the words expected, number, cycles and/or size:

    “I know that I will always be expected to have extra insight into black texts—especially texts by black women. A working-class Jewish woman from Brooklyn could become an expert on Shakespeare or Baudelaire, my students seemed to believe, if she mastered the language, the texts, and the critical literature. But they would not grant that a middle-class white man could ever be a trusted authority on Toni Morrison.”
    —Claire Oberon Garcia, African American scholar and educator. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B2 (July 27, 1994)

    “The more elevated a culture, the richer its language. The number of words and their combinations depends directly on a sum of conceptions and ideas; without the latter there can be no understandings, no definitions, and, as a result, no reason to enrich a language.”
    —Anton Pavlovich Chekhov (1860–1904)

    “The stars which shone over Babylon and the stable in Bethlehem still shine as brightly over the Empire State Building and your front yard today. They perform their cycles with the same mathematical precision, and they will continue to affect each thing on earth, including man, as long as the earth exists.”
    —Linda Goodman (b. 1929)

    “Our brains are no longer conditioned for reverence and awe. We cannot imagine a Second Coming that would not be cut down to size by the televised evening news, or a Last Judgment not subject to pages of holier-than-Thou second- guessing in The New York Review of Books.”
    —John Updike (b. 1932)