Random Permutation Statistics - A Problem From The 2005 Putnam Competition

A Problem From The 2005 Putnam Competition

A link to the Putnam competition website appears in the section External links. The problem asks for a proof that

\sum_{\pi\in S_n} \frac{\sigma(\pi)}{\nu(\pi)+1} =
(-1)^{n+1} \frac{n}{n+1},

where the sum is over all permutations of, is the sign of, i.e. if is even and if is odd, and is the number of fixed points of .

Now the sign of is given by

where the product is over all cycles c of, as explained e.g. on the page on even and odd permutations.

Hence we consider the combinatorial class


\mathfrak{P}(
- \mathcal{Z} + \mathcal{V} \mathcal{Z} +
\mathfrak{C}_1(\mathcal{Z}) +
\mathcal{U}\mathfrak{C}_2(\mathcal{Z}) +
\mathcal{U}^2\mathfrak{C}_3(\mathcal{Z}) +
\mathcal{U}^3\mathfrak{C}_4(\mathcal{Z}) + \cdots)

where marks one minus the length of a contributing cycle, and marks fixed points. Translating to generating functions, we obtain

g(z, u, v) =
\exp\left( -z + vz + \sum_{k\ge 1} u^{k-1} \frac{z^k}{k} \right)

or


\exp\left( -z + vz + \frac{1}{u} \log\frac{1}{1-uz} \right) =
\exp(-z + vz) \left(\frac{1}{1-uz} \right)^{1/u}.

Now we have

n! g(z, -1, v) =
n! \exp(-z + vz) (1 + z) =
\sum_{\pi\in S_n} \sigma(\pi) v^{\nu(\pi)}

and hence the desired quantity is given by

n! \int_0^1 g(z, -1, v) dv =
\sum_{\pi\in S_n} \frac{\sigma(\pi)}{\nu(\pi)+1}.

Doing the computation, we obtain

 \int_0^1 g(z, -1, v) dv =
\exp(-z)(1+z) \left(\frac{1}{z}\exp(z) - \frac{1}{z}\right)

or


\left(\frac{1}{z} + 1\right) \left(1 - \exp(-z)\right) =
\frac{1}{z} + 1 - \exp(-z) - \frac{1}{z} \exp(-z).

Extracting coefficients, we find that the coefficient of is zero. The constant is one, which does not agree with the formula (should be zero). For positive, however, we obtain

 n! \left( - \exp(-z) - \frac{1}{z} \exp(-z) \right) =
n! \left( - (-1)^n \frac{1}{n!} - (-1)^{n+1} \frac{1}{(n+1)!} \right)

or


(-1)^{n+1} \left( 1 - \frac{1}{n+1} \right) = (-1)^{n+1} \frac{n}{n+1},

which is the desired result.

As an interesting aside, we observe that may be used to evaluate the following determinant of an matrix:

d(n) = \det(A_n) =
\begin{vmatrix}
a && b && b && \cdots && b \\
b && a && b && \cdots && b \\
b && b && a && \cdots && b \\
\vdots && \vdots && \vdots && \ddots && \vdots \\
b && b && b && \cdots && a
\end{vmatrix}.

where . Recall the formula for the determinant:

Now the value of the product on the right for a permutation is, where f is the number of fixed points of . Hence

 d(n) = b^n n! g\left(z, -1, \frac{a}{b}\right)=
b^n n! \exp \left(\frac{a-b}{b} z\right) (1+z)

which yields

 b^n \left(\frac{a-b}{b}\right)^n + b^n n \left(\frac{a-b}{b}\right)^{n-1} =
(a-b)^n + n b (a-b)^{n-1}

and finally

Read more about this topic:  Random Permutation Statistics

Famous quotes containing the words problem, putnam and/or competition:

    Will women find themselves in the same position they have always been? Or do we see liberation as solving the conditions of women in our society?... If we continue to shy away from this problem we will not be able to solve it after independence. But if we can say that our first priority is the emancipation of women, we will become free as members of an oppressed community.
    Ruth Mompati (b. 1925)

    Even American women are not felt to be persons in the same sense as the male immigrants among the Hungarians, Poles, Russian Jews,—not to speak of Italians, Germans, and the masters of all of us—the Irish!
    —Mary Putnam Jacobi (1842–1906)

    Sisters define their rivalry in terms of competition for the gold cup of parental love. It is never perceived as a cup which runneth over, rather a finite vessel from which the more one sister drinks, the less is left for the others.
    Elizabeth Fishel (20th century)