Projection-slice Theorem - Proof in Two Dimensions

Proof in Two Dimensions

The projection-slice theorem is easily proven for the case of two dimensions. Without loss of generality, we can take the projection line to be the x-axis. There is no loss of generality because using a shifted and rotated line the law still applies. Using a shifted line (in y) gives the same projection and therefore the same 1D Fourier transform. Rotated function is the Fourier pair of the rotated Fourier transform, this completes the explanation.

If f(x, y) is a two-dimensional function, then the projection of f(x, y) onto the x axis is p(x) where

The Fourier transform of is

$F(k_x,k_y)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x,y)\,e^{-2\pi i(xk_x+yk_y)}\,dxdy.$

The slice is then

$s(k_x)=F(k_x,0) =\int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x,y)\,e^{-2\pi ixk_x}\,dxdy$

$=\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left\,e^{-2\pi ixk_x} dx$

$=\int_{-\infty}^\infty p(x)\,e^{-2\pi ixk_x} dx$

which is just the Fourier transform of p(x). The proof for higher dimensions is easily generalized from the above example.

Read more about this topic: Projection-slice Theorem

Famous quotes containing the words proof and/or dimensions:

“The thing with Catholicism, the same as all religions, is that it teaches what should be, which seems rather incorrect. This is “what should be.” Now, if you’re taught to live up to a “what should be” that never existed—only an occult superstition, no proof of this “should be”Mthen you can sit on a jury and indict easily, you can cast the first stone, you can burn Adolf Eichmann, like that!”
—Lenny Bruce (1925–1966)

“It seems to me that we do not know nearly enough about ourselves; that we do not often enough wonder if our lives, or some events and times in our lives, may not be analogues or metaphors or echoes of evolvements and happenings going on in other people?—or animals?—even forests or oceans or rocks?—in this world of ours or, even, in worlds or dimensions elsewhere.”
—Doris Lessing (b. 1919)