Preferred Number
In industrial design, preferred numbers (also called preferred values) are standard guidelines for choosing exact product dimensions within a given set of constraints. Product developers must choose numerous lengths, distances, diameters, volumes, and other characteristic quantities. While all of these choices are constrained by considerations of functionality, usability, compatibility, safety or cost, there usually remains considerable leeway in the exact choice for many dimensions.
Preferred numbers serve two purposes:
- Using them increases the probability of compatibility between objects designed at different times by different people. In other words, it is one tactic among many in standardization, whether within a company or within an industry, and it is usually desirable in industrial contexts. (The opposite motive can also apply, if it is in a manufacturer's financial interest: for example, manufacturers of consumer products often have a financial interest in lack of compatibility, in planned obsolescence, and in selling name-brand and model-specific replacement parts.)
- They are chosen such that when a product is manufactured in many different sizes, these will end up roughly equally spaced on a logarithmic scale. They therefore help to minimize the number of different sizes that need to be manufactured or kept in stock.
Read more about Preferred Number: Renard Numbers, Rail Gauges, 1-2-5 Series, E Series, Buildings, Paper Documents, Envelopes, and Drawing Pens, Computer Engineering, Retail Packaging, Music, Photography
Famous quotes containing the words preferred and/or number:
“The earlier works of a man of genius are always preferred to the newer ones, in order to prove that he is going down instead of up.”
—Victor Hugo (18021885)
“A great number of the disappointments and mishaps of the troubled world are the direct result of literature and the allied arts. It is our belief that no human being who devotes his life and energy to the manufacture of fantasies can be anything but fundamentally inadequate”
—Christopher Hampton (b. 1946)