Pratibha Mahila Sahakari Bank - Enquiries - Second Inquiry

Second Inquiry

Ministry of Finance on April 26, 2002, asked the RBI to inquire into allegations of fund irregularities after receiving a number of complaints from the Cooperative Bank Employees Union and small depositors of the bank.

In its 28-page inspection report noted that the bank had been declared “weak” since 1995 and after the 2002 inspection was being classified as “sick.”

The report revealed:

  • The real or exchangeable value of the bank’s paid-up share capital and reserves stands at minus Rs 197.67 lakh. Thus, the bank is not having adequate assets to meet its liabilities. The bank does not comply with the RBI’s requirement of minimum share capital.
  • The ratio of the net erosion to net owned funds of the bank is as high as 312.4% and the erosion in the value of the bank’s assets has not only wiped out its owned funds but has also affected the deposits to the extent of Rs 197.67 lakh, forming 26% of total deposits.
  • The gross non-performing assets of the bank amount to 65.8% of the total loans and advances.
  • The Board has not made any concerted effort to improve the bank’s financial position and bring it out of the weak status.

The RBI further stated in the report: “Pratibha Patil is the founder member of the bank, who is a politically influential personality. She has made all her relatives as directors of the bank and the bank is being run as good as a family business. Because of the influence of respondent no 8 (Prathiba Patil) the bank has given various loans to the relatives and to a sugar factory of which she is a director.”

“Her relatives have not paid back the loans. Most of the loans were given without security. Most of the loans are closed”

Read more about this topic:  Pratibha Mahila Sahakari Bank, Enquiries

Famous quotes containing the word inquiry:

    For what are the classics but the noblest thoughts of man? They are the only oracles which are not decayed, and there are such answers to the most modern inquiry in them as Delphi and Dodona never gave. We might as well omit to study Nature because she is old.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    An inquiry about the attitude towards the release of so-called political prisoners. I should be very sorry to see the United States holding anyone in confinement on account of any opinion that that person might hold. It is a fundamental tenet of our institutions that people have a right to believe what they want to believe and hold such opinions as they want to hold without having to answer to anyone for their private opinion.
    Calvin Coolidge (1872–1933)