Porsche LMP - Development

Development

On November 28, 1998 Porsche announced that they would not continue their development of the open-cockpit LMP1-98 for the 1999 24 Hours of Le Mans. The Porsche 911 GT1, which had won Le Mans in 1998 but struggled in the FIA GT Championship, would not be continued either, but this was due to its GT1 class being dissolved through FIA and ACO rule changes. Porsche would instead concentrate on development of the 911 GT3-R, a production-based car for various Grand Touring series. However, Porsche also announced that they would return to the top Le Mans Prototype class in 2000 with an all new car.

Design work on this new car had begun just prior to Porsche's announcement in 1998. An open-cockpit prototype, it originally planned to use a variation of Porsche's traditional turbocharged Flat-6 engine. By early 1999, the Flat-6 would be abandoned due to difficulties in using the aged design. Porsche would instead turn to the use of a naturally aspirated V10 engine that had originally been built in 1992. At that time, Porsche was providing engines for the Footwork Arrows Formula One team. They had initially used the 3512 3.5 litre V12 engines without much success, and Porsche had developed a new 3.5 litre V10 for 1992. However, Footwork decided to end their partnership with Porsche before the end of the 1991 season, so the new V10 was shelved. Requiring an advanced naturally aspirated engine, Porsche decided to develop these V10s for the prototype. The engines were expanded to 5.5 litres and had their pneumatic valve systems removed in order to increase longevity and endurance.

The first chassis began construction in the summer of 1999, with Lola Cars International building the carbon fiber tub. The new V10 would require slight modifications to the design work, including a large rear hump to accommodate the engine and its airbox integrated into a new single rollbar behind the cockpit (a design element Audi was also developing for their Audi R8 at the time). Suspension and transmission elements were borrowed and upgraded from the LMP1-98.

On November 21, 1999 just before the first chassis was completed, Porsche officially announced that the project was to be canceled. Porsche's official reasoning was that engineering staff on the LMP project would be needed for the new Cayenne SUV project which was more economically important to the company. Porsche was also content to continue development of the 911 GT3-R which had become the dominant car in the lower GT classes. It is also believed that Ferdinand Piëch, chairman of the Volkswagen Group, wanted the new Audi R8 to compete uncontested at the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Piëch supposedly offered aid in development of the Cayenne SUV in return.

Although the project was canceled, Porsche allowed for the prototype to be completed and conduct a two day test at the Weissach test track. Allan McNish and Bob Wollek both tested the car. Following the test, the car would be placed in storage and has not been seen since.

Read more about this topic:  Porsche LMP

Famous quotes containing the word development:

    “If you complain of people being shot down in the streets, of the absence of communication or social responsibility, of the rise of everyday violence which people have become accustomed to, and the dehumanization of feelings, then the ultimate development on an organized social level is the concentration camp.... The concentration camp is the final expression of human separateness and its ultimate consequence. It is organized abandonment.”
    —Arthur Miller (b. 1915)

    “The development of civilization and industry in general has always shown itself so active in the destruction of forests that everything that has been done for their conservation and production is completely insignificant in comparison.”
    —Karl Marx (1818–1883)

    “Somehow we have been taught to believe that the experiences of girls and women are not important in the study and understanding of human behavior. If we know men, then we know all of humankind. These prevalent cultural attitudes totally deny the uniqueness of the female experience, limiting the development of girls and women and depriving a needy world of the gifts, talents, and resources our daughters have to offer.”
    —Jeanne Elium (20th century)