Content
The main content of Plimpton 322 is a table of numbers, with four columns and fifteen rows, in Babylonian sexagesimal notation. The fourth column is just a row number, in order from 1 to 15. The second and third columns are completely visible in the surviving tablet. However, the edge of the first column has been broken off, and there are two consistent extrapolations for what the missing digits could be; these interpretations differ only in whether or not each number starts with an additional digit equal to 1. With the differing extrapolations shown in parentheses, these numbers are:
(1:)59:00:15 | 1:59 | 2:49 | 1 |
(1:)56:56:58:14:50:06:15 | 56:07 | 1:20:25 | 2 |
(1:)55:07:41:15:33:45 | 1:16:41 | 1:50:49 | 3 |
(1:)53:10:29:32:52:16 | 3:31:49 | 5:09:01 | 4 |
(1:)48:54:01:40 | 1:05 | 1:37 | 5 |
(1:)47:06:41:40 | 5:19 | 8:01 | 6 |
(1:)43:11:56:28:26:40 | 38:11 | 59:01 | 7 |
(1:)41:33:45:14:03:45 | 13:19 | 20:49 | 8 |
(1:)38:33:36:36 | 8:01 | 12:49 | 9 |
(1:)35:10:02:28:27:24:26 | 1:22:41 | 2:16:01 | 10 |
(1:)33:45 | 45 | 1:15 | 11 |
(1:)29:21:54:02:15 | 27:59 | 48:49 | 12 |
(1:)27:00:03:45 | 2:41 | 4:49 | 13 |
(1:)25:48:51:35:06:40 | 29:31 | 53:49 | 14 |
(1:)23:13:46:40 | 56 | 1:46 | 15 |
It is possible that additional columns were present in the broken-off part of the tablet to the left of these columns. Conversion of these numbers from sexagesimal to decimal raises additional ambiguities, as the Babylonian sexagesimal notation did not specify the power of the initial digit of each number.
Read more about this topic: Plimpton 322
Famous quotes containing the word content:
“Perchance the time will come when we shall not be content to go back and forth upon a raft to some huge Homeric or Shakespearean Indiaman that lies upon the reef, but build a bark out of that wreck and others that are buried in the sands of this desolate island, and such new timber as may be required, in which to sail away to whole new worlds of light and life, where our friends are.”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)
“You are not satisfied unless form is so strictly divorced from content that you can comprehend the one without almost without bothering to read the other.”
—Samuel Beckett (19061989)
“I have sometimes seen women, who would have been sensible enough, if they would have been content not to be called women of sensebut by aiming at what they had not, they only proved absurdfor sense cannot be counterfeited.”
—Horace Walpole (17171797)