Planar Separator Theorem - Statement of The Theorem

Statement of The Theorem

As it is usually stated, the separator theorem states that, in any n-vertex planar graph G = (V,E), there exists a partition of the vertices of G into three sets A, S, and B, such that each of A and B has at most 2n/3 vertices, S has O(√n) vertices, and there are no edges with one endpoint in A and one endpoint in B. It is not required that A or B form connected subgraphs of G. S is called the separator for this partition.

An equivalent formulation is that the edges of any n-vertex planar graph G may be subdivided into two edge-disjoint subgraphs G1 and G2 in such a way that both subgraphs have at least n/3 vertices and such that the intersection of the vertex sets of the two subgraphs has O(√n) vertices in it. Such a partition is known as a separation. If a separation is given, then the intersection of the vertex sets forms a separator, and the vertices that belong to one subgraph but not the other form the separated subsets of at most 2n/3 vertices. In the other direction, if one is given a partition into three sets A, S, and B that meet the conditions of the planar separator theorem, then one may form a separation in which the edges with an endpoint in A belong to G1, the edges with an endpoint in B belong to G2, and the remaining edges (with both endpoints in S) are partitioned arbitrarily.

The constant 2/3 in the statement of the separator theorem is arbitrary and may be replaced by any other number in the open interval (1/2,1) without changing the form of the theorem: a partition into more equal subsets may be obtained from a less-even partition by repeatedly splitting the larger sets in the uneven partition and regrouping the resulting connected components.

Read more about this topic:  Planar Separator Theorem

Famous quotes containing the words statement of the, statement of, statement and/or theorem:

    Eroticism has its own moral justification because it says that pleasure is enough for me; it is a statement of the individual’s sovereignty.
    Mario Vargas Llosa (b. 1936)

    The most distinct and beautiful statement of any truth must take at last the mathematical form.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    Truth is used to vitalize a statement rather than devitalize it. Truth implies more than a simple statement of fact. “I don’t have any whisky,” may be a fact but it is not a truth.
    William Burroughs (b. 1914)

    To insure the adoration of a theorem for any length of time, faith is not enough, a police force is needed as well.
    Albert Camus (1913–1960)